dnf versus yum
dan.mashal at gmail.com
Thu Jan 2 19:25:10 UTC 2014
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Richard Vickery
<richard.vickeryrv at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
>> look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
>> please realize that a drop-in replacement *first* needs to be *really*
>> drop-in and not "somehow like", otherwise all the things you may make
>> better are worthless
>> and yes "yum remove kernel" is a *minimum* to handeled properly
>> there are people maintaining RHEL5,RHEL6,RHEL7 and Fedora machines
>> guess how abused they are if they have completly different behavior
>> because dveleopers tend to call anything they don't like to implement
>> a "border case"
> Reindl makes a very good case here against the adoption. The last thing we
> want is to cause confusion in the community. It may be very wise to wait and
> give the community more time to absorb dnf. I confess that it would be a
> learning curve for me to use this command: I could imagine the headaches it
> would bring others with much more pressing deadlines.
> my 2 cents,
I don't understand what the learning curve is? It works exactly the
same as yum. Typing 'dnf' instead of 'yum' is a learning curve?
More information about the devel