On 05/11/2011 01:00 PM, John Dulaney wrote:
> I think so, but I'm wondering if getting emails immediately
when a test
> fails would be helpful instead of waiting until the next digest was sent.
Point.
> Do you think that receiving emails as a digest would be better than
> receiving emails deemed "important" as soon as they are generated and
> getting far fewer "PASSED" noise emails?
Indeed. Getting six emails saying "Yes, this works." is rather useless, to
me, especially when the sixth contains all the info in the previous five.
I might be misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you're talking about
the emails generated when people add comments to an update. If I'm
right, that is part of Bodhi and something that we can't change. You
could file an enhancement request for Bodhi or bring it up on devel@,
though.
Example:
The email bellow is for Anaconda. It contains everything that was in the
previous four emails I have received from Bodhi on this particular package.
Just the one would have been fine.
I think that the current plans of sending emails when all tests are done
or when there has been a state change between PASS and FAIL would take
care of the extra email noise generated by AutoQA. More details are in
trac [1].
Are we missing a case where this wouldn't be true?
Tim
[1]
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/wiki/Planning05xEmailReduction