Re: PATCH proposal - new Koji watcher
Thanks Kamil, that will teach me to post patches on late fridays :)
/me hates typos & is fixing the patch right now
Do you think it would be better to push the changes into new git
branch, or should I send yet another huuuuge patch?
J.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kamil Paral" <kparal(a)redhat.com>
To: "AutoQA development" <autoqa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 1:15:00 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome /
Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: PATCH proposal - new Koji watcher
----- "Kamil Paral" <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
It's too much new code to check for correctness, but I tried to run
that,
and I have a few tracebacks for you :)
Ok, some more:
http://fpaste.org/sVA9/
Those 'atest job create' failures are expected (no autotest server package
installed), the rest are not.
Maybe we should print out the command being run with verbose turned on even
if dryrun is turned off, what say you?
_______________________________________________
autoqa-devel mailing list
autoqa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-devel