New branch - multihook_tests

[Vojtěch Aschenbrenner]

Hiya autoqa friends,

I created a new git branch named 'multihook_tests'. There are some
modified tests which are now able to run with both post-koji-build and
post-bodhi-update hooks. It's first dirty version, but it should be
function (it's tested with a few packages).

[Will Woods]

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 19:35 +0200, Vojtěch Aschenbrenner wrote:
>  Hiya autoqa friends,
>  
>  I created a new git branch named 'multihook_tests'. There are some
>  modified tests which are now able to run with both post-koji-build and
>  post-bodhi-update hooks. It's first dirty version, but it should be
>  function (it's tested with a few packages). 
The changes look pretty good to me. Just to confirm: this makes the
initscripts, rpmguard, and rpmlint tests run for both post-koji-build
and post-bodhi-update, correct?

Since you've tested it out and confirmed that it works - and there seem
to be no other comments/objections - I think we can safely merge this
into master for the next autoqa release.

Merged and pushed. Thanks!

-w

[Kamil Paral]

----- "Will Woods" <wwoods(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 19:35 +0200, Vojtěch Aschenbrenner wrote:
>  > Hiya autoqa friends,
>  >
>  > I created a new git branch named 'multihook_tests'. There are some
>  > modified tests which are now able to run with both post-koji-build
>  and
>  > post-bodhi-update hooks. It's first dirty version, but it should be
>  > function (it's tested with a few packages).
>  
>  The changes look pretty good to me. Just to confirm: this makes the
>  initscripts, rpmguard, and rpmlint tests run for both post-koji-build
>  and post-bodhi-update, correct?
>  
>  Since you've tested it out and confirmed that it works - and there
>  seem
>  to be no other comments/objections - I think we can safely merge this
>  into master for the next autoqa release.
>  
>  Merged and pushed. Thanks! 
To tell the truth, only now I've had time to review this and I have
found some stuff that I don't fancy and even some mistakes (like
commenting out support for opt-in emails). Unfortunately Vojta is no 
longer available so that we could discuss some of his changes.

I'll have to go through this properly and re-do it a little. In the
meantime, please don't include this patchset in the upcoming autoqa
release, thanks.

[James Laska]

On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 04:15 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
>  ----- "Will Woods" <wwoods(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  
>  > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 19:35 +0200, Vojtěch Aschenbrenner wrote:
>  > > Hiya autoqa friends,
>  > >
>  > > I created a new git branch named 'multihook_tests'. There are some
>  > > modified tests which are now able to run with both post-koji-build
>  > and
>  > > post-bodhi-update hooks. It's first dirty version, but it should be
>  > > function (it's tested with a few packages).
>  > 
>  > The changes look pretty good to me. Just to confirm: this makes the
>  > initscripts, rpmguard, and rpmlint tests run for both post-koji-build
>  > and post-bodhi-update, correct?
>  > 
>  > Since you've tested it out and confirmed that it works - and there
>  > seem
>  > to be no other comments/objections - I think we can safely merge this
>  > into master for the next autoqa release.
>  > 
>  > Merged and pushed. Thanks!
>  
>  To tell the truth, only now I've had time to review this and I have
>  found some stuff that I don't fancy and even some mistakes (like
>  commenting out support for opt-in emails). Unfortunately Vojta is no 
>  longer available so that we could discuss some of his changes.
>  
>  I'll have to go through this properly and re-do it a little. In the
>  meantime, please don't include this patchset in the upcoming autoqa
>  release, thanks. 
Thanks Kamil,

I'm pulling from master for the new 0.4 content.  As long as this is in
a different branch until it's cleaned up, I think we'll be good.

Thanks,
James