On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:56:50AM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
Does this mean you are going to remove the non-jackson libraries for
doing JSON once it is merged?
yeah, i'd see no point in keeping a dep on jettison around.
On 05/24/2010 08:56 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Given the feedback (albeit marginal) from the rest-easy guys.. if you
> all like this.. push it in.
>
> It will break the java and ruby clients.. but that is ok. They can be fixed
>
> -- bk
>
> On 05/19/2010 09:49 AM, James Bowes wrote:
>
>> I pushed out some changes to the jackson branch last night which:
>> - make objects serialized as json use human readable datetimes
>> - allow you to configure pretty printed json via the
>> candlepin.pretty_print=<boolean> config value (looks awesome in the
>> logs for debugging, if i do say so myself)
>> - use either jackson or jaxb annotations for reading/writing objects,
>> prefering the jackson ones, if present.
>>
>> These are done by making our own jax-rs JsonProvider and twiddling the
>> jackson configuration. In the process of writing this I found out that
>> we could really do it with the provider provided (heh) by RestEasy or
>> Jackson without subclassing, but I still do think the provider will be
>> the place to do input validation, so I went ahead and made the class.
>>
>> -James
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> candlepin mailing list
>> candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
>>
> _______________________________________________
> candlepin mailing list
> candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
>
_______________________________________________
candlepin mailing list
candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
-James