Re: what's new in jackson

[Adam Young]

Does this mean you are going to remove the non-jackson libraries for 
doing JSON once it is merged?


On 05/24/2010 08:56 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
>  Given the feedback (albeit marginal) from the rest-easy guys.. if
> you
>  all like this.. push it in.
>
>  It will break the java and ruby clients.. but that is ok. They can be fixed
>
>  -- bk
>
>  On 05/19/2010 09:49 AM, James Bowes wrote:
>     
> > I pushed out some changes to the jackson branch last night which:
> > - make objects serialized as json use human readable datetimes
> > - allow you to configure pretty printed json via the
> >     candlepin.pretty_print=<boolean>   config value (looks awesome in the
> >     logs for debugging, if i do say so myself)
> > - use either jackson or jaxb annotations for reading/writing objects,
> >     prefering the jackson ones, if present.
> >
> > These are done by making our own jax-rs JsonProvider and twiddling the
> > jackson configuration. In the process of writing this I found out that
> > we could really do it with the provider provided (heh) by RestEasy or
> > Jackson without subclassing, but I still do think the provider will be
> > the place to do input validation, so I went ahead and made the class.
> >
> > -James
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > candlepin mailing list
> > candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
> >      
>  _______________________________________________
>  candlepin mailing list
>  candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/candlepin
>