Sorry, My mistake,
PXE/ESXi 5 - OK gPXE/ESXi 5 - Not OK gPXE/ESXi 5/ESXi 5 - OK
It is an Intel card, Desktop Pro 1G.
I will start looking at some variations and try them out. There may be some different gPXE builds I can do. Maybe there is some UNDI variation.
Also an interesting comment from this blog
http://blog.markusbordihn.de/2009/04/gpxe-and-localboot.html
"Because pxelinux will unload from the memory before it load the chain.c32 it works without any problems and also the localboot has the full avalible memory"
I am wondering if gPXE somehow operates within it's own memory restricted environment.
Thanks
John
-----Original Message----- From: cobbler-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:cobbler-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of James Cammarata Sent: 01 December 2011 13:10 To: cobbler mailing list Subject: Re: [PATCH] support for gPXE and esxi5
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:47 AM, John Paget Bourke john.bourke@mobileinternet.com wrote:
Hi,
If I manually install ESXi on my hardware and then create an ESXi VM inside (ESXi on ESXi), then try build from Cobbler with gPXE, it works !!!
So gPXE/ESXi 5 - OK So gPXE/ESXi 5 - Not OK So gPXE/ESXi 5/ESXi 5 - OK
So it must be some kind of hardware issue, some strange interaction between gPXE and ESXi on that hardware ?
Maybe I need to put this to the gPXE people ?
Is it an Intel NIC? I vaguely remember seeing a post somewhere about Intel cards allocating a huge amount of buffers, causing issues when booting on a kvm guest, however I can't seem to find it now.
Also, I'm not 100% clear on which situations are working for you and which ones aren't - #1 and #2 seem to be the same. _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list cobbler@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler