docs-qa October 2014

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
149 discussions

[Bug 1001356] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001356 Bug ID: 1001356 Summary: No Default Syslog Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998573 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically, remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. In particular, review for coverage of `journalctl` and journald features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Oct '14

13 Oct '14

The following is a list of requests people have made of you, which have been outstanding more than 7 days. To avoid disappointing others, please deal with them as quickly as possible. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (13 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1149926] New: Опечатки
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Oct '14

13 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149926 Bug ID: 1149926 Summary: Опечатки Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: selinux-user-guide Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Reporter: eve.ashumi(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mprpic(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Вырезки оригинальные - можно копировать и серчить. Ошибки выделил капсом. Список дааалеко не полный, а скорее, просто для оценки масштаба бедствия поэтому рекомендую пройтись по руководству вдоль и поперек :) Fedora 13 Security-Enhanced Linux. Linux с улучшенной безопасностью ошибка_1: ...SELinux создан АгЕнством Национальной Безопасности... ошибка_2: ...Обладая способностью ограничивать привЕлегии, связанные с исполнением процессов... ошибка_3: ...доступ к потенциально конфЕденциальной информации, без... ошибка_4: ...Type Enforcement® (TE), и опциАонально многоуровневой модели безопасности, Multi... ошибка_5: ...риск, связанный с уязвимостью повышения привЕлегий в системе... ошибка_6: ...к /etc/shadow, и меняет пароль поЛЗователя... ошибка_7: ...политики SELinux должны быть пройденГНы, перед... ошибка_8: ...не могут выполнять любые дрУИе приложения... ошибка_9: ...процессы запущены с привЕлегиями суперпользователя, эти... ошибка_10: ...домены могут выпООлнять переход в домен... ошибка_11: ...процессы не могут выполнять записТь в файлы с типом... ошибка_12: ...В Fedora, полЬОватели Linux работают неограниченно... ошибка_13: ...В первой вкладке\терминале нажМимаем... ошибка_14: ...определяет, что процеСАм, запущенным в домене... ошибка_15: ...которые запускаются в Linux с привЕлигиями пользователя root ошибка_16: ...домен, то неограниченные полЬователи Linux являются... ошибка_17: ...Следующие ограниченНные пользователи SELinux существуют... ошибка_18: ...того чтобы повысить привЕлегиЯ до пользователя root. ошибка_19: ...приложения в их домаЩних каталогах или... ошибка_20: ...однако он до сих пор иСОльзуется для анализа AVC сообщений... и так далее... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1150725] Anaconda partition manager won't install bootloader to MBR
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Oct '14

10 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150725 --- Comment #5 from dhardy <redhat(a)dhardy.name> --- Oh dear, David, yes, I did get a bit frustrated there (not your fault, I don't think). Actually, I did run into a case of multiple new partitions all having the same size, and some difficulties with LVM groups (maybe more to do with transparency than capabilies) but that's another story. Chris: I disagree. Good software should give good error messages, and "I need an EFI partition on a GPT-formatted disk" is not a good description of why a legacy bootloader can't be used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1150725] Anaconda partition manager won't install bootloader to MBR
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150725 --- Comment #4 from David Lehman <dlehman(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to dhardy from comment #0) > I've been trying to install Fedora 21 Alpha (workstation). The installer's > partition manager is totally crap Off to a good start. At least we know you're being rational and objective. > (can't manage LVM volume groups, Incorrect. > sizes every new partition to the size of the first free space, Incorrect. > doesn't show free spaces on the disk, Also incorrect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1150725] Anaconda partition manager won't install bootloader to MBR
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Oct '14

09 Oct '14

1 0

[Bug 986370] New: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986370 Bug ID: 986370 Summary: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: justin.mitchell.bennett(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Description of problem: With OEMs shipping preloads of Windows 8 on new purchase computers, UEFI tends to be enabled by default. Though Fedora can work with a secure boot UEFI bios, certain features have been disable (See Fedora 18 UEFI Secure Boot Edition 18.4). As hibernation (suspend to disk) functionality has been disabled on an UEFI Secure Boot system, users need to be aware, prior to installation of Fedora (as sole OS on the system), whether to enable or disable this functionality. Those using Fedora on a laptop/netbook, shouldn't discover *after* completing installation, that hibernation has been disabled. It becomes a huge pain, to google how to disable the /boot/efi partition, and grub2, if even possible. If not documented or referenced in the install-guide, CommonBugs should make note of this issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 18, Fedora 19 How reproducible: Install Fedora on a system with a Secure Boot, UEFI, enabled bios. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1150189] New: Needs to be brought up to date.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150189 Bug ID: 1150189 Summary: Needs to be brought up to date. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Version says Fedora18 we are well past that Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/System_Administrators_Gu… Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1148964] New: New bugzilla component for Firewall Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148964 Bug ID: 1148964 Summary: New bugzilla component for Firewall Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Please create a new bugzilla component for the Firewall Guide, "firewall-guide", in the Fedora Documentation product. You can set me as the default assignee and docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org as the default QA contact. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa October 2014