docs-qa November 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
166 discussions

[Bug 1001353] New: No Default Sendmail
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001353 Bug ID: 1001353 Summary: No Default Sendmail Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998571 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998571 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Sendmail For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail No longer install an MTA by default. (Specifically let's remove sendmail from @core and @standard comps groups.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001347] New: NetworkManager Bonding Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001347 Bug ID: 1001347 Summary: NetworkManager Bonding Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dcbw(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998567 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998567 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bonding Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBonding NetworkManager should be able to configure bond master interfaces with commonly used options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without disrupting their operation. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001214.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001355] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001355 Bug ID: 1001355 Summary: No Default Syslog Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998573 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically, remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021138] New: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021138 Bug ID: 1021138 Summary: Sugar 0.100 (1.0) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998549 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998549 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Sugar 0.100 (1.0) For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Sugar-0.100 Update Sugar to the new upstream 0.100 (1.0) release. --- Additional comment from Peter Robinson on 2013-08-23 05:48:46 EDT --- Feature is substantially complete. We're still awaiting the upstream final 0.100 (or 1.0) release but it's all working in Fedora on the current latest release --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:17 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --------------------- Tracking bug for documenting this Change in the Release Notes. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998549 [Bug 998549] Sugar 0.100 (1.0) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1021137] New: typo? "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021137 Bug ID: 1021137 Summary: typo? "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: hugh(a)mimosa.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: sparks(a)redhat.com Description of problem: "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Revision 18.4 Tue 11 March 2013 Eric Christensen <http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/UEFI_Secure_Boot_…> Additional info: In section 1.5.1 there is a bullet point: the acpi_rspd command line option, which is used to specify custom ACPI data When I google for acpi_rspd, it suggests that I probably meant acpi_rsdp. If I insist, all the hits seem to be derived from the UEFI-secure-boot-guide (some are amusing). So I conclude that this spelling is a typo. OT: is there a reason that this document is filed under Fedora 18 (I'm using Fedora 19)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008194] New: Enlightenment
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '13

21 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008194 Bug ID: 1008194 Summary: Enlightenment Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, metherid(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 954132 (Enlightenment-Tracker), 998517 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998517 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enlightenment For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Enlightenment Enlightenment 0.17 a new stable release has been released after 12 years or so of development. As many desktops are being landed on Fedora, Integrating Enlightenment in Fedora can not only enlarge the number of available desktops in Fedora, but also improve user experiences and give users another choice of Desktop Environment. ------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001210.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021178] New: The instructions for burning an ISO to disk only cover Gnome
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021178 Bug ID: 1021178 Summary: The instructions for burning an ISO to disk only cover Gnome Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Severity: low Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co Reporter: joe(a)zeff.us QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The instructions for burning an ISO under Linux only cover Gnome. There should at least be some information on how this is done under KDE, Xfce and LDXE. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100$ Steps to Reproduce: 1.Use a DE other than Gnome 2.Look for information here on burning an ISO Actual results: Nothing Expected results: Somewhat more comprehensive coverage Additional info: Yes, I understand that Fedora is Gnome-centric, but there should, at the very least, be an attempt to cover the other most popular DEs. As far as the more obscure selections go, it's probably safe to say that if you know enough to install it and get it working properly, you probably know enough not to need help from this page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1021151] New: X2Go
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021151 Bug ID: 1021151 Summary: X2Go Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: cickumqt(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, orion(a)cora.nwra.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998551, 969209, 969212, 969220, 990815, 990817, 991286, 991292, 1004094 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998551 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: X2Go For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/X2Go The X2Go project has taken over development of the old NX libraries and has developed new clients and server code around it. We will move to use the X2Go NX library in Fedora and include the full X2Go suite. --- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-08-22 11:20:42 EDT --- Review of main nx-libs component is stalled. --- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-08-31 00:11:58 EDT --- We seem to be making progress again. Current issues: - nx-libs should be approved soon - x2goclient is blocking on a bundled library exception - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/343 - remmina-plugins-nx and qtnx will need to require nxproxy - freenx-server will need to require nxagent As a proven packager I can make the above two changes once nx-libs is imported. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:44:45 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-14 10:28:01 EDT --- Orion, I can see all tracker bugs closed. Does this mean this Change is completed now and could be moved to ON_QA? --- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-10-14 15:05:26 EDT --- yes, I think so. ============================= Tracking bug for inclusion in Release Notes Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969209 [Bug 969209] Review Request: nx-libs - NX X11 protocol compression libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 [Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220 [Bug 969220] Review Request: x2goserver - Server for use with the X2Go network based computing environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815 [Bug 990815] Review Request: x2godesktopsharing - Share X2go desktops with other users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817 [Bug 990817] Review Request: python-x2go - Python module providing X2Go client API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991286 [Bug 991286] Review Request: pyhoca-gui - Graphical X2Go client written in (wx)Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991292 [Bug 991292] Review Request: pyhoca-cli - Command line X2Go client written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998551 [Bug 998551] X2Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004094 [Bug 1004094] Review Request: cups-x2go - CUPS backend for printing from X2Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1008196] New: GLIBC 2.18
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008196 Bug ID: 1008196 Summary: GLIBC 2.18 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: codonell(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 999952 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #999952 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: GLIBC 2.18 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/GLIBC218 Switch GLIBC in Fedora 20 to GLIBC version 2.18 -------------------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184937.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1021133] New: docs-check: Shared Certificate Tools
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021133 Bug ID: 1021133 Summary: docs-check: Shared Certificate Tools Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stefw(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998546 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998546 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Shared Certificate Tools For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SharedCertificateTools Fedora now has infrastructure for sharing system trusted certificates between the various crypto libraries. --- Additional comment from Stef Walter on 2013-08-29 08:32:51 EDT --- Substantiably testable using p11-kit-0.19.4 which is in Fedora 20. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:13 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule =========================== Docs Task: Identify documentation that is impacted by this change and open bugs as required. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998546 [Bug 998546] Shared Certificate Tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa November 2013