docs-qa March 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
35 discussions

[Bug 922305] New: I can't build this doc for f18(and f17)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Mar '13

17 Mar '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922305 Bug ID: 922305 Summary: I can't build this doc for f18(and f17) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: musicians-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: christopher.antila(a)adjectivenoun.ca Reporter: elf(a)poyo.jp QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Description of problem: I can't build this doc for f18. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. git clone ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/docs/musicians-guide.git 2. git checkout f18 3. publican build --embedtoc --publish --formats html-single --langs ja-JP Actual results: This step is to create a Fedora Draft Documentation. $ find publish -type f -name \*.html publish/ja-JP/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html-single/Musicians_Guide/index.html Expected results: I want to create a Musicians Guide for f18. Additional info: I can not create a document also for f17. Work results, for the f16 is created. $ git checkout f17 $ publican build --embedtoc --publish --formats epub,html,html-single --langs ja-JP $ find publish -type f -name \*.html publish/ja-JP/Fedora/16/html-single/Musicians_Guide/index.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 920442] New: Typos in some new messages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Mar '13

12 Mar '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920442 Bug ID: 920442 Summary: Typos in some new messages Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: yurchor(a)ukr.net Created attachment 708774 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=708774&action=edit Patch to fix the typos Description of problem: Some new files contain typos Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): git/master How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: Open files from the patch attached Actual results: funcionality firmwre Expected results: functionality firmware Additional info: thanks for fixing these typos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 912563] New: Instructions faulty and/or lackng regarding validation of ISO's from a Windows 7 platform
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '13

08 Mar '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912563 Bug ID: 912563 Summary: Instructions faulty and/or lackng regarding validation of ISO's from a Windows 7 platform Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: j.moorhouse(a)zoomtown.com Created attachment 699286 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=699286&action=edit Attachment 3 (the other 2 weren't allowed); 3 attempts at Command Prompt Description of problem: First, you assume that the CHECKSUM file is readily available; it isn't. It can be found by clicking the proper link from https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify . In "Burning ISO Images to disc" 3.1 you suggest 3 free tools to check the hashes in a Windows Graphical Environment; none work. HashTab (att 1) doesn't cover the SHA256 algorithm, the web site for the Marxio File Checksum Verifier couldn't be accessed, snd the DiviHasher (att 2) worked fine except that the length of the calculated hash exceeded the space available. In 3.2 (att 3), we are trying the Command Line. The first attempt does it just like the manual; it failed. The second assumed that by "Owner" in the manual example you meant to substitute the actual name of the owner; it too failed. The third attempt does the directory change in one operation and the hash calculation in another, because that works; doing them both in the same contiguous operation doesn't. Incidentally, Windows no longer uses those cuddly little "My Whatever" expressions. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Very!! I spent over a week fighting this! Steps to Reproduce: 1. Just follow the printed directions exactly 2. 3. Actual results: See attachments Expected results: Calculation of a valid checksum Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 879745] New: 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host causes systax errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879745 Bug ID: 879745 Summary: 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host causes systax errors Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: freeipa-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: deanhunter(a)comcast.net Description of problem: Following the instructions in Section 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host of the FreeIPA Guide results in systax errors in the Apache configuration. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 FreeIPA Guide freeipa-server.x86_64 2.2.1-2.fc17 How reproducible: consistently Steps to Reproduce: 1. Follow the instructions to modify ipa.conf 2. apachectl configtest Actual results: WSGISocketPrefix cannot occur within <VirtualHost> section KrbConstrainedDelegationLock cannot occur within <VirtualHost> section Expected results: Syntax OK Additional info: I am trying to server user content from the Apache server installed with FreeIPA. I thought if I configured the IPA server into a virtual host I could create additional virtual hosts for user content without conflict. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 848546] New: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848546 Bug ID: 848546 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Summary: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: rmeggins(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: freeipa-guide Product: Fedora Documentation https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/FreeIPA_Guide/creating-… "The FreeIPA setup process can be minimal, where the administrator only supplies some required information, or it can be very specific, with user-defined settings for many parts of the FreeIPA services. The configuration is passed using arguments with the ipa-install-server script." This should say ipa-server-install -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa March 2013