[Bug 1008192] New: Developer Assistant GUI
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008192
Bug ID: 1008192
Summary: Developer Assistant GUI
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bkabrda(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
phracek(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998501
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998501 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Developer Assistant GUI
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/DeveloperAssistantGUI
The feature aims to provide GUI for devassistant package.
--- Additional comment from Petr Hracek on 2013-08-23 03:53:55 EDT ---
Main Developer Assistant GUI is finished and testable.
Problem with aborting project creation was already solved.
GUI for creation of user assistants depends on some devassistant-lint engine
which is not implemented yet (will be in future).
devassistant-lint program should check whether yaml assistant is correct and
runnable by devassistant engine.
Developer Assistant Creator GUI can be used only for beginners which do not
want to use any command line or IDE editor for YAML files.
Field "Fixed in Version" will be filled during next week when will be a new
release
--- Additional comment from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda on 2013-08-28 07:57:30 EDT
---
Testable in devassistant-0.6.1-2.fc20 by invoking "da-gui".
------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001190...
Please document this change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 4 months
[Bug 1036843] New: x2go section of Fedora 20 Release notes says "Closed Source" and infers x2go is based on closed source
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036843
Bug ID: 1036843
Summary: x2go section of Fedora 20 Release notes says "Closed
Source" and infers x2go is based on closed source
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dowdle(a)montanalinux.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Looking at the Fedora 20 release notes today I see that the x2go section
(3.1.1.1) says:
"X2Go is a featureful remote desktop solution based on NoMachine's now closed
source NX project."
While NoMachine's new NX4 product is indeed closed source / proprietary, x2go
is NOT based on NX4. It is based on the GPL'ed NX3 libraries. I think that
sentence is poorly worded and needs to be clarified. I'd recommend:
"X2go is a featureful remote desktop solution based on a fork of NoMachine's
GPL'ed NX3 libraries."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 4 months
[Bug 1021138] New: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021138
Bug ID: 1021138
Summary: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998549
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998549 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Sugar-0.100
Update Sugar to the new upstream 0.100 (1.0) release.
--- Additional comment from Peter Robinson on 2013-08-23 05:48:46 EDT ---
Feature is substantially complete. We're still awaiting the upstream final
0.100 (or 1.0) release but it's all working in Fedora on the current latest
release
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:17 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100%
Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1].
All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be
validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required
bug state at this point is ON_QA.
As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a
point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be
reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any
questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
---------------------
Tracking bug for documenting this Change in the Release Notes.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998549
[Bug 998549] Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 4 months
[Bug 1021137] New: typo? "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021137
Bug ID: 1021137
Summary: typo? "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp"
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: hugh(a)mimosa.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: sparks(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
"acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Revision 18.4 Tue 11 March 2013 Eric Christensen
<http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/UEFI_Secure_Boo...>
Additional info:
In section 1.5.1 there is a bullet point:
the acpi_rspd command line option, which is used to specify custom ACPI data
When I google for acpi_rspd, it suggests that I probably meant acpi_rsdp. If I
insist, all the hits seem to be derived from the UEFI-secure-boot-guide (some
are amusing).
So I conclude that this spelling is a typo.
OT: is there a reason that this document is filed under Fedora 18 (I'm using
Fedora 19)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
10 years, 4 months