docs-qa December 2014

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
147 discussions

[Bug 1002289] New: it is deprecated, right?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Dec '14

07 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002289 Bug ID: 1002289 Summary: it is deprecated, right? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: translation-quick-start-guide Assignee: noriko(a)redhat.com Reporter: kraymond(a)shaiton.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: aalam(a)redhat.com, dimitris(a)glezos.com, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, noriko(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Hi, this guide is deprecated IMHO. The L10n team moved to the wiki while we moved from transifex.fedoraproject.org to fedora.transifex.net The new guide is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Guide I removed this guide from the fedora-docs release at transifex.com (but it's just a name to gather guides). The guide is still at https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/translation-quick-start-guide/ I can see that Raven has blocked the translations. nice. Please update (or close?) the fedorahosted repo https://fedorahosted.org/translation-quick-start-guide/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008575] New: Install Guide Tweaking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008575 Bug ID: 1008575 Summary: Install Guide Tweaking Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Please consider corrections for Fedora 20 install guide. The following is my feedback for F19 Install guide. Description of problem: Improvement recommendation for Install Guide. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Insta… Under 1.1. Typographic Conventions The indented paragraph reads To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell prompt and press Enter to execute the command. I would replace the word "see" with view. To view the contents of the... For me, "see" would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view the contents. As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder" whereas view translates to "voir". Il voit le contenu. Please correct for Fedora 20. ====== Further on the same page... Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data loss. My comment. Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not attended to, will most likely cause data loss. ======= Follow page with Introduction Introduction This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free and open source software. Please change ... built on ... to built with. My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is built with free and open source software ======= Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you say "Install Fedora onto a computer"? If the latter is more correct, this fragment is found within the Audience section. ======= 2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files? To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download, refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”. Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in "Of which Architecture Is My Computer?" (sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1069985] New: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069985 Bug ID: 1069985 Summary: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Release notes for Fedora 20 contains nothing about the changes to kickstart options. It would be helpful if changes to kickstart options will be noticed in future release notes too. Now I know that I have to check the wiki diffs of the Anaconda/Kickstart wiki page to see the changes, but other administrators may check only the release notes. An example is the "--addsupport=" option to the "lang" kickstart option which was added to Fedora 20 (I assume... - I have no information about the time of the change), together with "%packages ... -instLangs=..." still not implemented. Please see also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051816#c11 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 release notes. How reproducible: Always. Another note: This request is to improve the next release notes. But I want to note that there should a place (web page, wiki page, etc.) too where additional (late) informations can be added to release notes of already released Fedora versions. Is such a place available? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1158767] New: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not verified anymore
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158767 Bug ID: 1158767 Summary: RELNOTES - Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not verified anymore Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tmraz(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Blocks: 168083 (fc5-relnotes-traqr) OpenSSL was patched to disallow verification of certificates that are signed with MD5 algorithm. The use of MD5 hash algorithm for certificate signatures is now considered as insecure and thus all the main crypto libraries in Fedora were patched to reject such certificates. Certificates signed with MD5 algorithm are not present on public https web sites anymore but they can be still in use on private networks or used for authentication on openvpn based VPNs such as in bug 1157260. It is highly recommended to replace such certificates with new ones signed with SHA256 or at least SHA1. As a temporary measure the OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY environment variable can be set to allow verification of certificates signed with MD5 algorithm. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168083 [Bug 168083] FC5 release notes tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1060328] New: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060328 Bug ID: 1060328 Summary: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed (section 2.8.1) during normal installs. It appears, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSyslog, that it got moved from @core to @standard. However, I suspect that a lot of users will do installs that include @standard, and as a result they will get rsyslog installed and perhaps be confused as to why they got it when the Release Notes imply it is no longer included. I can confirm that the repodata/ac802acf81ab55a0eca1fe5d1222bd15b8fab45d302dfdf4e626716d374b6a64-Fedora-20-comps.xml file on the x86_64 install DVD contains rsyslog in the @standard package group. Also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSendmail implies that sendmail got moved from @core to @standard, whereas it appears to me that it actually got removed from both of them (at least I can't find it anywhere in the comps.xml file). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 x86_64 DVD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1171368] New: "KDE Software Collection" means "KDE Software Compilation"?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Dec '14

06 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171368 Bug ID: 1171368 Summary: "KDE Software Collection" means "KDE Software Compilation"? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The Fedora 21 release notes refer to "KDE Software Collection" in section desktop-KDE-4-14-and-SDDM in Desktop.xml [1]. Does the notes mean "KDE Software Compilation"[2] by "KDE Software Collection"? [1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/docs/release-notes.git/tree/en-US/Desktop… [2] https://www.kde.org/community/whatiskde/softwarecompilation.php Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): f21 Expected results: Not "KDE Software Collection" but "KDE Software Compilation"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Dec '14

01 Dec '14

The following is a list of requests people have made of you, which have been outstanding more than 7 days. To avoid disappointing others, please deal with them as quickly as possible. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (62 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2014