November 2015 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1284490] New: Link in Fedora 23 documentation refers to Fedora 21 documentation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284490 Bug ID: 1284490 Summary: Link in Fedora 23 documentation refers to Fedora 21 documentation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: jay.krishnanm(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org The link to "Networking Guide" in the section describing adding network support for virtual machines points to Fedora 21 documentation. It should ideally be pointing to networking guide in Fedora 23 documentation. The below link points to "6.3 Network Support" which contains the error. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Virtualization_Gettin... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (419 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1249314] New: yumex-dnf is not following the install only_limit config parameter default 3

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249314 Bug ID: 1249314 Summary: yumex-dnf is not following the install only_limit config parameter default 3 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: software-management-guide Severity: medium Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: totalitout(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0 Build Identifier: Using yumex-dnf when installing an updated kernel, the oldest kernel is not removed. All kernels remain installed, apparently without limit. The default to keep only the 3 newest kernels is ignored. Running: dnf update removes excess kernels, the limit of 3 is observed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open yumex-dnf, run update. 2.Reboot to load updated kernel. 3.Kernel list displays more than 3 installed kernels. Actual Results: More than 3 kernels remain installed. The install only_limit config parameter default 3 is ignored. Expected Results: Oldest kernel should be removed. No more than 3 kernels should remain installed. No error message. Didn't have any indication of a problem except when rebooting noticed the excess kernels listed. This needs to be fixed. It could cause unaware users to run out of space in their /boot partition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1282631] New: Wrong common bug link in Feedback

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282631 Bug ID: 1282631 Summary: Wrong common bug link in Feedback Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jb.holcroft(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co The link on "feedback" doesn't work : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Welcome_to_Fedora_.html#sect-Release_Notes-Feedback if it were correct, it would be wrong because zanata on document f23 tells me it's this link in production : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs you can see it in Zanata here : https://fedora.zanata.org/webtrans/translate?project=fedora-release-notes&iteration=f23&localeId=fr&locale=fr#view:doc;doc:pot/Feedback;untranslated:show;fuzzy:show;rejected:show -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1282629] New: Perl 5.2.2 or 5.22 ?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282629 Bug ID: 1282629 Summary: Perl 5.2.2 or 5.22 ? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: medium Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jb.holcroft(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co I assume there's something wrong with this string : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Changes_for_Developers.html#sect-devel It should be 5.22 or 5.22.0, translations are impacted, change can be transparent for many languages (if you can do that) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (412 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1282233] New: SUSE Studio ImageWriter does not work for me in Windows 10

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282233 Bug ID: 1282233 Summary: SUSE Studio ImageWriter does not work for me in Windows 10 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ajstewart426(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: I tried running SUSE Studio ImageWriter on Windows 10 but was unable to create boot media. I would consider removing it from your documentation as a suggested procedure. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Latest version of SUSE Studio ImageWriter on Windows 10 How reproducible: On a Windows 10 computer, download and install SUSE Studio ImageWriter. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download and install SUSE Studio ImageWriter. 2. Run the program and attempt to select your downloaded .iso file. 3. You may have to change the file selection dialog's options to view ISO or all file types. Actual results: In the latest version of SUSE Studio ImageWriter, at least on Windows 10, I was unable to switch the file selection type to *.iso or all file types. The only option available to me was *.raw. Expected results: There should be an option to switch file types, but it doesn't appear available. I would recommend dropping SUES Studio ImageWriter from your suggestions. Additional info: Rawrite 32 ended up working for me on Windows 10. I can also confirm that dd worked for me on Mac OS X. I would further recommend that you add a section for Mac users or combine it in with Linux since the instructions are so similar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1277694] New: F23 install guide still referring to FedUp

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277694 Bug ID: 1277694 Summary: F23 install guide still referring to FedUp Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: damidalla(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Install Guide is still referring to obsolete FedUp tool. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):23 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open Fedora Install Guide 2. Go to Chapter 12 Actual results: The Guide still refers to FedUp, with Section 12.1 "Automatic System Upgrade Using FedUp" linking to FedUp Wiki page, even if FedUp is obsolete. Expected results: The Guide should refer to DNF System Upgrade and link to the appropriate Wiki page. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1222305] New: Release notes scattered with references to YUM. DNF replaces yum

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222305 Bug ID: 1222305 Summary: Release notes scattered with references to YUM. DNF replaces yum Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: high Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The release notes on the web are not current and do not match the Fedora 22 release. The release notes within the Fedora 22 /usr/share/doc are also refering to Fedora 19 in places. In preparation for Fedora 22 release notes it looks like someone searched for Fedora 21 and changed the 21 to 22. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1266636] New: Link for update-crypto-policies needs updated.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266636 Bug ID: 1266636 Summary: Link for update-crypto-policies needs updated. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: medium Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: sheldon.corey(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The anchor link for the update-crypto-policies referencing the rc4 ciphers and such is dead. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): only found in 23 How reproducible: Always in R/N for 23 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Navigate to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/sect-Re... 2. Click on the `update-crypto-policies' hyperlink 3. 404 page presented to you. Actual results: should redirect to https://github.com/nmav/fedora-crypto-policies/blob/master/update-crypto-... Expected results: presented with a github 404 error page Additional info: Merely needs fixing /updating of the reference link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

8 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa November 2015