[Bug 1192174] New: Unhelpful links on LXDE spin page
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192174
Bug ID: 1192174
Summary: Unhelpful links on LXDE spin page
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jhhaynes(a)earthlink.net
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Several "how to use this file" links on the LXDE spins web page simply point
to the top Fedora documentation page. This is unhelpful when you need to know
how to use this file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F21
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Bring up F21 LXDE spin web page
2.Click on any "how to use this file link"
3.
Actual results:
Gets to top of Fedora documentation tree
Expected results:
Should tell exactly how to use this file
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 1152883] New: Local replication of Product installation trees
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152883
Bug ID: 1152883
Summary: Local replication of Product installation trees
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
It doesn't look like there will be a DVD image, the traditional source in our
instructions for site-provided installation repos. Consider conjuring up a
procedure explaining how an administrator could obtain a mirror of the
installation tree for each Product (whatever anaconda is pointed at for the
netinstalls) without having to pull in the entire repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158
Bug ID: 979158
Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens
windows when you hot add virtio drives
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-guide
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot
adding scsi drive
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver
in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
using the previose version 1-52 works fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762
Bug ID: 999762
Summary: Java FAQ
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: low
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009
2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during
install and recommends against use of OpenJDK.
3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy
integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java.
The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 1001342] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001342
Bug ID: 1001342
Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
pmachata(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883,
991919, 998564
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154
This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20.
--- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT ---
Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT ---
(In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1)
> Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
> weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
> iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?).
Thanks.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 1001341] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001341
Bug ID: 1001341
Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pmachata(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883,
991919, 998564
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154
This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20.
--- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT ---
Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT ---
(In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1)
> Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two
> weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin,
> iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars).
Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?).
Thanks.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 10 months