[Bug 1152883] New: Local replication of Product installation trees
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152883
Bug ID: 1152883
Summary: Local replication of Product installation trees
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
It doesn't look like there will be a DVD image, the traditional source in our
instructions for site-provided installation repos. Consider conjuring up a
procedure explaining how an administrator could obtain a mirror of the
installation tree for each Product (whatever anaconda is pointed at for the
netinstalls) without having to pull in the entire repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 6 months
[Bug 1244513] New: dnf rebuild --what to do to recover from database crash
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244513
Bug ID: 1244513
Summary: dnf rebuild --what to do to recover from database
crash
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: high
Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Part way through dnf update the application emitted an error message along with
instructions to perform a dnf rebuild.
dnf rebuild is not in the man pages, or in Fedora Documents that I looked at.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Random or when dnf encounters a database inconsistancy
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
No information within Fedora documentation. Found information on the web
Expected results:
dnf rebuild should be part of the internal dnf options and should also be
included in the man/info pages.
Additional info:
Found this information on the web...
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/rebuilding-corrupted-rpm-database.html
rm -rf /var
# cd /var/lib
# rm __db*
Rebuild RPM database:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpmdb_verify Packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158
Bug ID: 979158
Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens
windows when you hot add virtio drives
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-guide
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot
adding scsi drive
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver
in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
using the previose version 1-52 works fine
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 7 months
[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762
Bug ID: 999762
Summary: Java FAQ
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: low
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009
2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during
install and recommends against use of OpenJDK.
3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy
integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java.
The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months