Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769438
Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within
rpm-guide-programming-python.xml
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: rpm-guide
AssignedTo: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com
QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 548940
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=548940
Patch to Rpm Guide to fix rpm-guide-programming-python.xml
Unfortunately the examples of Python code within the RPM guide have been
thoroughly broken since the initial conversion to DocBook, due to the way
Python treats leading whitespace as significant.
I'm attaching a patch which overhauls this page, so that the code examples are
syntactically valid. See the notes in the patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253462
Bug ID: 1253462
Summary: Error in
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Docum
entation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/ch16s03s05.html
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: rpm-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
Reporter: nbasanes(a)cisco.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Created attachment 1062752
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1062752&action=edit
This attachment is a screenshot of a more readable result.
Description of problem:
The Python code section at
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…
has an error in the following code:
# Dependencies
print "Provides:"
print h.dsFromHeader('providename')
print "Requires:"
print h.dsFromHeader('requirename')
if h.dsFromHeader('obsoletename'):
print "Obsoletes:"
print h.dsFromHeader('obsoletename')
if h.dsFromHeader('conflictname'):
print "Conflicts:"
print h.dsFromHeader('conflictname')
print h.dsFromHeader('conflictname') outputs <rpm.ds object at 0xb77584b8>.
h.dsFromHeader('conflictname'), without the "print" word, outputs it right.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.1
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Copy the python code from the page to a file called rpminfo.py on a computer
that has the older version of Python, Python 2.
2. Run the Python code, by running the "cd" command until you get to the folder
that contains rpminfo.py.
3. Run rpminfo.py by entering the command python rpminfo.py.
Actual results:
Provides:
<rpm.ds object at 0xb77584b8>
Requires:
<rpm.ds object at 0xb77584b8>
Expected results:
Provides:
P config(httpd) = 2.2.15-39.el6.centos
Requires:
R libapr-1.so.0
Additional info:
The members of the object returned by dsFromHeader have integer indexes, since
the following code produces a more readable result:
# Dependencies
print "Provides:"
print h.dsFromHeader('providename')[0]
print "Requires:"
print h.dsFromHeader('requirename')[0]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163568
Bug ID: 1163568
Summary: POSIX capabilities "%caps" macro not mentioned
anyhwere
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: rpm-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
Reporter: matt(a)nightrealms.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
The RPM guide doesn't mention the "%caps" macro which can be used to set a
file's POSIX capabilities (see http://linux.die.net/man/7/capabilities) It
should go in chapter 9, section 5.4, at URL
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115469
Bug ID: 1115469
Summary: Link to full documentation is incorrect
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: rpm-guide
Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
Reporter: msuchy(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
This page:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…
links to
/usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.1/apidocs/html/group__python.html
Which does not exist on recent Fedoras.
RPM API is documented at:
/usr/share/doc/rpm-apidocs/index.html
And I did not find documentation for rpm-python itself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025475
Bug ID: 1025475
Summary: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: rpm-guide
Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
Reporter: admin(a)velusuniverse.co.uk
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
calligra-kexi-driver-mysql summary says mysqwl driver for kexi but shouldnt it
say mysql driver for kexi ??
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
use the yum extender andd look up calligra-kexi-driver-mysql
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
ummary says mysqwl driver for kexi
Expected results:
mysql driver for kexi
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017792
Bug ID: 1017792
Summary: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: rpm-guide
Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
In the "Verifying the %files section" chapter of the RPM guide [1], there is
written "symlink", but it seems RPM uses "link" instead.
Also I had trouble with the "maj" and "min", I guess there is "rdev" used
instead.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.1
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See the "Verifying the %files section" chapter
Actual results:
There are symlink, maj and min
Expected results:
The link and probably rdev
Additional info:
[1]
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003962
Bug ID: 1003962
Summary: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: rpm-guide
Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com
Reporter: daniel.neuberger(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
The fedora RPM guide does not document the -p option that can be passed to the
RPM scriptlets. It should probably be located here
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…,
but I looked through the entire guide and couldn't find it.
The only only place I could find it documented is here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets, but what it says is
wrong. It says:
"The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the
rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which allows the
scriptlet to invoke a single program directly rather than having to spawn a
shell to invoke the programs. (ie: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig)"
A more accurate description is:
"The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the
rpm spec file.
The scripts support a special flag, -p which specifies the interPreter that
should be used to run the script (the default is /bin/sh). Sometimes the -p
option is used with no body in order to run a single command directly rather
than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs (i.e. %post -p
/sbin/ldconfig). Note that this form requires that there be nothing but white
space (not even comments) until the next section begins."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057882
Bug ID: 1057882
Summary: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of
the Czech translation ready
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: publishing-requests
Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Please publish an updated Czech version of the F20 Installation Quick Start
Guide
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Mostly grammar errors found in current version.
Expected results:
An updated Czech translation published - missing translation(s) added,
translation revision and precision.
Additional info:
If the bug BZ#1056196 is a serious obstacle, publish this update once the bug
is resolved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050903
Bug ID: 1050903
Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech
translation
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: publishing-requests
Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
Please publish an update of the Czech translation of Burning ISO images to disc
guide
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Translation update - missing translation, revision and precision.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365347
Bug ID: 1365347
Summary: Please Publish edits made to virt-getting-started and
Release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: publishing-requests
Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: grundblom(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org
Hello,
I have made corrections to the release notes, and I would like to request to
have them published to the website (docs.fedoraproject.org)
Also, I would like to request that the Virtualization Getting Started Guide
become available on the website (docs.fedoraproject.org)
The Virtualization Getting Started Guide has been migrated to:
https://pagure.io/virt-getting-started-guide
Let me know if you need more information or I have missed a step in this
process to get these published.
Thank you very much!
-Glen
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.