[Bug 1001344] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001344
Bug ID: 1001344
Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
vgoyal(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998565
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot
Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This
feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines.
--- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT ---
I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not
sure how to do it.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT ---
(In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1)
> I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am
> not sure how to do it.
Vivek, create Package Review -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and
block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps.
Thank you.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 1001343] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001343
Bug ID: 1001343
Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
vgoyal(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998565
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot
Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This
feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines.
--- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT ---
I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not
sure how to do it.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT ---
(In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1)
> I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am
> not sure how to do it.
Vivek, create Package Review -
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and
block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps.
Thank you.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 977042] New: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977042
Bug ID: 977042
Summary: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
The System Administrator's Guide references a number of GUI utilities, many of
which are specific to GNOME. It isn't immediately obvious to the uninitiated
that this is the case, causing non-GNOME users to find fault with the guide.
I suggest an admonition in the preface along the lines of "Some of the
graphical procedures and menu locations are specific to GNOME, but most command
line instructions will be universally applicable" Comprehensively
differentiating between GNOME procedures, procedures for other DEs, and
universal procedures would probably be prohibitively time consuming.
--Pete
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 997219] New: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219
Bug ID: 997219
Summary: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: readme-burning-isos
Assignee: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Reporter: sirjake(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
Guide says that you can right click on a ISO image and choose "Write to disc."
This is not true, at least with Fedora 19.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
19
How reproducible:
Always, at least in 32 bit.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Burning_ISO_images_to_...
2. Insert a DVD.
3. Attempt to follow the directions above. No "Write to disk" option exists.
Actual results:
No obvious way to burn ISO images in Fedora Linux 19.
Expected results:
Directions to burn ISO disk in Fedora Linux 19
Additional info:
I had a new-to-me computer that I assumed would not support 64 bit, but after
installing 32 bit found out that 64 was supported by my processor. I downloaded
64 ( Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-1.iso ), and wanted to burn a disk of it,
but the option was not available and the directions online did not help. I had
to go back to Windows on a different machine to burn it.
Note: I do have a DVD burner on this machine. The same thing occurs with CD's
in the burner.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 9 months
[Bug 948823] New: Need a search solution for docs.fedoraproject.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948823
Bug ID: 948823
Summary: Need a search solution for docs.fedoraproject.org
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: project-tracking
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com
Category: ---
Description of problem: Due to the removal of Google search feature (see bug
616876) we no longer have a search solution for docs.fp.o.
We need to investigate an alternate solution and bring the search feature back.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 1220066] New: grub2-install suggestion doesn't distinguish between BIOS and UEFI installs
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220066
Bug ID: 1220066
Summary: grub2-install suggestion doesn't distinguish between
BIOS and UEFI installs
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com
ttps://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/System_Administrators_...
Section 20.4 and 20.4.1 apply only to BIOS computers, not UEFI. On UEFI:
1. grub2-install fails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101352
2. If grub2-efi-modules is installed, grub2-install succeeds but then:
2a. This will break UEFI Secure Boot systems because the core.img/grubx64.efi
binary that gets created isn't signed and therefore UEFI Secure Boot will
reject it.
2b. On UEFI systems without Secure Boot, GRUB behavior is different in a number
of ways including that it will no longer look to /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
but rather to /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.
Two ways to fix the documentation:
a.) A side bar that says this section doesn't apply to systems with UEFI
firmware (maybe a link to where we give them a hint "how to find out what kind
of firmware you have"), and/or that this section is effectively done by 20.4.2
step 3.
b.) Reorganize 20.4 into discreet BIOS and UEFI sections.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 1288809] New: Minor discrepancy in the Fedora documentation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288809
Bug ID: 1288809
Summary: Minor discrepancy in the Fedora documentation
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: documentation-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pj.pandit(a)yahoo.co.in
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Document URL: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/index.html
Section Number and Name: Older Fedora documentation
Describe the issue: It still talks about F19 & F20 releases.
"The Fedora Documentation Project only maintains documentation for Fedora 19
and Fedora 20."
Suggestions for improvement: It should be F21 & F22, as older releases.
Additional information:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 1002573] New: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002573
Bug ID: 1002573
Summary: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, me(a)petetravis.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, pkennedy(a)redhat.com,
security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com,
steved(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 984718, 998566, 1001346
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1001346 +++
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998566 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS
The Linux Kernel has grown support for passing SELinux labels between a client
and server using NFS.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001216...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 982914] New: 7.4.1. Configuring 802.1x Security
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982914
Bug ID: 982914
Summary: 7.4.1. Configuring 802.1x Security
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: system-administrator's-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In section 7.4.1 under 'Procedure 7.8. For a wired connection...', '
Procedure 7.9. For a wireless connection...':
The 'Network Connections' dialogue can be accessed via:
activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections, or via
nm-connection-editor
This is not specified at all in this section.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
7 years, 10 months