docs-qa February 2018

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
20 discussions

[Bug 1358932] New: How to create an USB stick with overlay persistence with graphical tools?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Apr '18

30 Apr '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358932 Bug ID: 1358932 Summary: How to create an USB stick with overlay persistence with graphical tools? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: razvan.sandu(a)mobexpert.ro QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Hello, Description of problem: The online guide at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB#Data_persiste… which is installation-related, describes how to create a Fedora bootable USB stick using the graphical tool liveusb-creator with overlay persistence. However, the current graphical tool available in Fedora (called "Fedora Media Writer") offers no obvious option (button, slider, etc.) for adding an overlay persistence space to the official .iso image. Actual results: The current graphical tool offers no option of adding overlay persistence to an .iso image that is written on an USB stick. Expected results: The tool should offer such an option, in order to easily create USB bootable sticks with persistence. The existing documentation should be consistent with the actual tool. Additional info: IMHO, adopting and documenting a STANDARD set of tools (graphical & CLI), as DISTRO-INDEPENDENT (cross-distro) as possible, for the (easy) creation of bootable USB sticks (including overlay) is the way to go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1525400] New: Pictures that illustrate the System Monitor tool are henceforth obsolete.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Apr '18

06 Apr '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525400 Bug ID: 1525400 Summary: Pictures that illustrate the System Monitor tool are henceforth obsolete. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: ricky.tigg(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Pictures that illustrate the System Monitor tool are henceforth obsolete. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gnome-system-monitor-3.26.0-1.fc27.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Home | Fedora 27 | Fedora System Administration Guide | Monitoring and Automation | System Monitoring Tools. 2. Launch System Monitor. Actual results: In the on-line documentation, in pictures that illustrate the tool, a System tab is visible. Such tab is no longer implemented in current component. Expected results: Update regarding the pictures are needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1314499] New: Typo in Section 5.4.8: Installation Destination
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Mar '18

15 Mar '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314499 Bug ID: 1314499 Summary: Typo in Section 5.4.8: Installation Destination Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: hrusjos(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: There is, apparently, a word missing before "Add a disk button" in the para starting with "The Specialized & Network Disks section below shows advanced network storage..." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Please see line #39 of the StorageSpoke.xml Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: to search for network storage devices <guilabel>Add a disk</guilabel> button Expected results: to search for network storage devices press <guilabel>Add a disk</guilabel> button and proceed with <xref linkend="sect-installation-gui-installation-destination" />. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1492509] New: Boot logo not showing up and many lines of command show up on boot
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Mar '18

08 Mar '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492509 Bug ID: 1492509 Summary: Boot logo not showing up and many lines of command show up on boot Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: nelsonleiva8(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: When I boot my system, instead of the Fedora logo showing up while booting, I get lots of commands showing on black screen: ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT2._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce5c8), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) > ata3.00: ATA-8: TOSHIBA DT01ACA100, MS2OA750, max UDMA/133 > ata3.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA > ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) >ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT0._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce410), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) > ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT1._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0cea78), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) >l: ata2.00: ATAPI: TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-224BB, SB00, max UDMA/100 > ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) >ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT2._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce5c8), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible >ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata1.00: NCQ Send/Recv Log not supported ata1.00: ATA-9: Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB, EXT0BB6Q, max UDMA/133 >ata1.00: 234441648 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA > ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT1._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0cea78), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) >ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100 ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT0._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce410), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) the system runs fine after this process, lets me log in and I've had no errors while using it. But is there a way to have a normal boot up with just a Fedora logo while it loads then take me to the login screen? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 26 Kernel 4.12 How reproducible: Every time it boots. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: CPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT2._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce5c8), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) > ata3.00: ATA-8: TOSHIBA DT01ACA100, MS2OA750, max UDMA/133 > ata3.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA > ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) >ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT0._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce410), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) > ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT1._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0cea78), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) >l: ata2.00: ATAPI: TSSTcorp CDDVDW SH-224BB, SB00, max UDMA/100 > ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) >ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT2._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce5c8), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) ata1.00: supports DRM functions and may not be fully accessible >ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata1.00: NCQ Send/Recv Log not supported ata1.00: ATA-9: Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB, EXT0BB6Q, max UDMA/133 >ata1.00: 234441648 sectors, multi 1: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32), AA > ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT1._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0cea78), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) >ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100 ACPI Error: [DSSP] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psargs-359) ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.SPT0._GTF] (Node ffff8e820d0ce410), AE_NOT_FOUND (20160831/psparse-543) Expected results: The Fedora Icon while loading and the login screen Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1546559] New: Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Feb '18

28 Feb '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546559 Bug ID: 1546559 Summary: Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: accessibility-guide Severity: low Assignee: gerard(a)ryan.lt Reporter: xvryhkw(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: gerard(a)ryan.lt, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 1397628 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1397628&action=edit Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army Hacked By KingSkrupellos CyBeRiZM.Org Digital Security Technological Turkish Moslem Army -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Feb '18

26 Feb '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1245 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1344465] New: Copyright should be 2016 - can we also have translation of license ?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Feb '18

19 Feb '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344465 Bug ID: 1344465 Summary: Copyright should be 2016 - can we also have translation of license ? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jb.holcroft(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co when building f24 release notes, the result is "Copyright © 2014 Fedora Project Contributors." the result should be " © 2016" btw, is there any reason not to translate this license ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Feb '18

19 Feb '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1238 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 Feb '18

12 Feb '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1231 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 05 Feb '18

05 Feb '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1224 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa February 2018