[Bug 1012697] New: There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4 chapter (Kickstart options) and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012697

            Bug ID: 1012697
           Summary: There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4
                    chapter (Kickstart options) and
                    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart
           Product: Fedora Documentation
           Version: devel
         Component: install-guide
          Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
          Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es
        QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
                CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co



It seems Wiki is more updated, because at least in "upgrade" option shows a
note like this: "Note that from F18 onward, upgrades are no longer supported in
anaconda and should be done with FedUp, the Fedora update tool.", whereas in
Install Guide this note doesn't exist. And there are more differences between
these two places, so I'm confused about which of these is the right place to
have the right reference.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

[Bug 1012697] There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4 chapter (Kickstart options) and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012697

Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
        Last Closed|                            |2014-09-01 09:19:17



--- Comment #1 from Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com&gt; ---
Hi,

I'm closing it as a duplicate. It is not actually one - this bug was obviously
opened way earlier than the other one - but we're planning to review and mostly
rewrite the whole chapter anyway, and this would be only a part of that task so
it makes more sense to keep the other one open.

Please see BZ#1136021.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1136021 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.