https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Bug ID: 1357567 Summary: Need to publish latest version of Defensive Coding Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: defensive-coding-guide Priority: high Assignee: zach@oglesby.co Reporter: sparks@redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fweimer@redhat.com Blocks: 1357534
Can we get the latest version of the Defensive Coding Guide published? I don't think it's been updated since the Publican toolchain broke.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com --- (In reply to Eric Christensen from comment #0)
Can we get the latest version of the Defensive Coding Guide published? I don't think it's been updated since the Publican toolchain broke.
Are the instructions in the Fedora Documentation Guide still up-to-date?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
--- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- Source is now available at: https://pagure.io/defensive-coding-guide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
--- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
Are the instructions in the Fedora Documentation Guide still up-to-date?
Based on the Copyright date and the authors listed on that document I'm going to go with a "no".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
--- Comment #4 from Zach Oglesby zach@oglesby.co --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #1)
(In reply to Eric Christensen from comment #0)
Can we get the latest version of the Defensive Coding Guide published? I don't think it's been updated since the Publican toolchain broke.
Are the instructions in the Fedora Documentation Guide still up-to-date?
Not so much, but we will work on getting this published.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nmavrogi@redhat.com, | |zach@oglesby.co Flags| |needinfo?(zach@oglesby.co)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(nmavrogi@redhat.c | |om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(zach@oglesby.co) | |needinfo?(nmavrogi@redhat.c | |om) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(zach@oglesby.co)
--- Comment #8 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com --- Hi Zach, how soon can we have this updated? Can we have this generation automated from the upstream repository so we do not have long delays in the next updates?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(zach@oglesby.co)
--- Comment #9 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- Any update on this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567
Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(zach@oglesby.co) | |needinfo?(zach@oglesby.co) | Last Closed| |2017-03-08 12:26:39
--- Comment #10 from Eric Christensen sparks@redhat.com --- I think we're going to try to get this rendered under the Red Hat brand since we're using it for our customers. Obviously, feel free to render it as Fedora if you wish in the future.
docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org