[Fedora-electronic-lab] EL-5 comps versus FEL collection
by Chitlesh GOORAH
Hello there,
On Fedora, we have a comps group 'electronic-lab' which facilitates
the users' life to install FEL (Fedora Electronic Lab) collection:
# yum groupinstall 'Electronic Lab'
I wish to have a similar comps group for the EPEL-5 branch. Of course,
not all packages under the FEL collection are in EPEL-5 branch due to
compatibility reasons. If you are interested to follow FEL packages
found in Fedora branches and EPEL-5 branch please visit
* For detailed list with respective versions and build dates:
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html
* FEL-12 Release Notes (EPEL-5 Repository Section)
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf
We already have 42 packages of the FEL collections in EPEL-5
repository. I really want to extend FEL support for the EL
distributions as our userbase is growing and requesting long term
support.
Kind Regards,
Chitlesh Goorah
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-electronic-lab] Request to register a "Main" desktop Category: Electronics
by Chitlesh GOORAH
Hello there,
This is a request to register a "Main" desktop Category: Electronics
so that it becomes a standard defined by
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
Name: Electronics
Description : Electronics design and simulation software, e.g. a
circuit designer
Notes: (none)
For nearly 3 years, Fedora is also striving to provide an advanced
electronic design and simulation platform for electronic hardware
development under the name of "Fedora Electronic Lab". In short we
provide opensource solutions for people to develop from IC chips to a
final product e.g openmoko smartphone.
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL
I'm writing you this email on behalf of all upstream projects we are
working with so that we all can deliver an unified and standard set of
guidelines for other linux distributions, not only for Fedora.
Problems we have WITHOUT this electronics main category:
* The software we are providing do not fall under "Education"
freedesktop MAIN category but fall into an advanced engineering
category not yet defined by the freedesktop standard. At the same
time, we don't want to mix software for Electronic Engineering and
Mechanical Engineering, thus category "Engineering" isn't appropriate
for a long term solution.
* An unified and standard set of guidelines for all linux
distributions and developers.
* There are a lot of electronic "design flows". Each design flow
contains various set of software. If all the software for electronic
design falls into various categories, it does not give any linux
distribution the proper credentials and value of their solutions.
Opensource solutions are there but lost inside the bag.
* No Compatibility across various desktop environments: KDE, gnome,
XFCE, LXDE,...
We are hoping that if this "Electronics" main category is approved,
packagers of various distributions and developers will add
Categories=Electronics;
to their desktop files.
In order not to drown other users into complexity, one of the gEDA
developers came up with a small package called "electronics-menu"
http://geda.seul.org/dist/electronics-menu-1.0.tar.gz
which provides a "Electronics" menu as described by the RED arrow :
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/images/electronic-menu.png
Please accept the icon provided
http://geda.seul.org/dist/electronics-menu-1.0.tar.gz.
On Fedora, we have tuned our GUI electronics software's desktop files
so that they support this "Electronics" main category. I was told that
even debian is opting for this type of menu category.
As you can see on this page:
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html
we have quite a handful set of GUI for electronic design. That said,
other electronic solutions are also mixed and confuses a lot of users
as they (newbies) can't distinguish the software set they need for
their respective design flow (analog, digital, mixed signal,
embedded). Hence, I've added submenu support to the
http://geda.seul.org/dist/electronics-menu-1.0.tar.gz as described by
the YELLOW arrow. However, we are still under discussion about the
proper subcategory naming. Thus please leave these additional
categories for a later discussion.
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/images/electronic-menu.png
Kind regards,
Chitlesh Goorah
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-electronic-lab] Call for Review : FEL 12 Release Notes (draft)
by Chitlesh GOORAH
Hello there,
We have drafted FEL'12 Release Notes, which we dearly want to hear your views.
http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/papers/FEL12ReleaseNotes.pdf
As you have read on fedora planet, many universities and small
startups are deploying Fedora Electronic Lab. Thus we hope that these
release notes will help them deduce whether they need to upgrade to
Fedora 12 or not with respect to their needs and design flow. As the
document reflects, 42 packages for electronic design and simulation
are now available for the EL-5 branch.
The document also entails some details about various patches we have
applied on our packages, which are not yet available under upstream
stable release. I'm happy to say have most of our upstream accepted
most of our patches, which is good news for the opensource eco-system.
For those who are eager to try our nightly FEL spins, please find the ISO here
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/electronic-lab/
Cheers,
Chitlesh Goorah
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #48: (tracker) verilog-mode update on Fedora rawhide
by fedora-badges
#48: (tracker) verilog-mode update on Fedora rawhide
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh
Type: upstream | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine'
Component: FEL | Version: devel
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
verilog-mode (included in emacs upstream) is outdated and does not include
the SystemVerilog and Open Verification Methodology (OVM) support.
Fedora Electronic Lab needs this lastest verilog-mode features. Hence
Loganaden Velvindron took the initiative to ensure emacs gets the latest
verilog-mode version with appropriate testing.
As for the EL-5 repository which includes emacs 21 does not have verilog-
mode at all. A special package emacs-verilog-mode was pushed to the EL5
repository. This package is a Requires: of the "dinotrace" package.
This ticket serves as a tracker on the progress made till now on this
matter.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2009-07/msg01572.html
If you have some updates on this tracker, pleas feel free to update it.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/48>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.
14 years, 7 months
[Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #14: Component libraries
by fedora-badges
#14: Component libraries
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: anonymous | Owner: chitlesh
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: FEL | Version: 10
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
HI,
I love the concept of FEL and I have FEL 10 installed. I have tried
gSchem and Kicad before and the main problems I have are the lack of a
broad component library. Will there be a move to create a component
library to share? I see a site that has a conversion of Eagle libraries
but I am not sure as to the legality or quality.
Without offense, having gSchem, Kicad, and Xcircuit in the release, it
seems like a lack of direction. I would pay for a GPL release that was
focused and had a solid user supported component libraries. I ma not a
great programmer so I am not sure how I can help.
duncan.mcnamara(a)gmail.com
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/14>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.
14 years, 7 months