Regarding
OpenOffice.org and OpenType support, here is a recent thread
at the UX (User Experience) mailing list on features to include in
OpenOffice.org Writer 3.1,
http://ux.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=1890
A few people mentioned OpenType support,
http://ux.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=1894
http://ux.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=1899
The way to go with OOo and OpenType support, is to have users request
it, at the appropriate forums.
Simos
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Vasile Gaburici <vgaburici(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Since we are debating the state of Fedora fonts, I'd also like to
add
that Fedora should ship as many OpenType fonts as possible. Why?
Because it (finally!) includes a decent bundle of TeX (texlive), which
contains XeTeX -- a version of TeX that can use advanced OpenType
features directly. XeTeX is still a bit inferior to pdftex in some
respects (no microtypography), but is far easier to use. Yeah, OOo
should get OpenType support too, but I personally don't care much
about it.
FYI: Because Fedora up to release 8 kept including the obsolete tetex,
which I had to patch manually many times, I skipped all Fedoras
between 5 and 9! Anything in between would have been a downgrade for
me after I started manually adding up to date packages to tetex. And
no, I could not just add them locally because they conflicted with the
bundled packages in complex ways, so the old ones had to be deleted --
so no yum update tetex for me.
_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list