Em Sex, 2011-03-11 às 13:44 +0100, Sandro "red" Mathys escreveu:
On 03/09/2011 09:43 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
My idea was to involve the European ambassadors and FAMSCo in the decision-making process, as they're the ones most directly involved in the decision. For FUDCon LATAM, the community came together and agreed on Panama, so I didn't have to do much decision-making from my side.
I'd suggest while FAmSCo might represent the users (i.e. the U in FUDCon), FESCo should also be involved to represent the developers (the D).
I second that. Although I don't think that FAmSCo is exactly user's representatives I do believe that having at least a FESCo member in the decision-making process is a good idea. The developer's view is something I missed when the decision for the next FUDCon LATAM was made. Certainly the opinions from FESCo members should be heard.
Regards,