haskell-devel February 2011

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
116 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630224] Review Request: ghc-attempt - Concrete data type for handling extensible exceptions as failures
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630224 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-attempt-0.3.0-1.fc14 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-02-07 14:54:23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630224] Review Request: ghc-attempt - Concrete data type for handling extensible exceptions as failures
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630224 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-07 14:54:17 EST --- ghc-attempt-0.3.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|needinfo?(mathstuf(a)gmail.co | |m) | Last Closed| |2011-02-07 14:53:08 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648100] Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-07 14:53:02 EST --- ghc-xml-1.3.7-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630198] Review Request: ghc-safe - Library for safe (pattern match free) functions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630198 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-safe-0.3-1.fc14 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-02-07 14:52:51 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630198] Review Request: ghc-safe - Library for safe (pattern match free) functions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630198 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-07 14:52:46 EST --- ghc-safe-0.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 651656] Review Request: ghc-ltk - A UI toolkit for Leksah
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651656 --- Comment #1 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-07 06:18:20 EST --- I will update the spec file to cabal2spec 0.22.4 and provide the new links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 651613] Review Request: haddock - Haskell documentation tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651613 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #18 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-07 06:07:00 EST --- F15 build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=217316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630282] Review Request: ghc-MonadCatchIO-mtl - Monad-transformer for Control.Exception
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630282 --- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-06 22:00:43 EST --- Upstream has updated license to BSD3 with a new release 0.3.0.2. Can you please update your .spec file and make a new package release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] ghc library subpackaging
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Hi Haskell SIG, Some of you may have noticed that I did some major repackaging of ghc's libraries recently (finally managed to persuade ghc-rpm-macros to allow multiple library subpackages). This has already been in rawhide ghc for some weeks and I have now backported the changes to F14, but not yet pushed the build to f14-updates-testing: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=216954 I think this is a good thing (though it does mean that ghc now has a lot of subpackages!) since it makes it very clear and transparent what core libraries are being used by what packages, and it also puts them on the same footing as other libraries. This particularly makes sense for libraries like syb and dph that were moved out of ghc for 7.0. Note also that all binlib package executables in F15 will be dynamically linked, so separating the shared libs from ghc-libs seems like a good thing. There is still a ghc-devel compatibility meta-package, that pulls in all the ghc-*-devel subpackages from ghc (except the big ghc API library), which can be used for now when building bin packages. After F13 goes EOL I would like to drop the ghc-prof and ghc-devel BR's from packages and list library dependencies from ghc explicitly. Packages will also need to BR ghc-Cabal-devel. cabal2spec should also be able to determine Haskell dependencies by then I hope. While I haven't heard any screaming or complaints yet, before going on I wanted to post here and hear any feedback or comments on the splitting and plans. I hope people appreciate the new modularity, but if you feel it could be done better please speak up. :) Jens

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel February 2011