haskell-devel February 2011

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
116 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] f15 ghc built on ppc
by Jens-Ulrik Petersen 10 Feb '11

10 Feb '11

Hi Adrian, Ok good news: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129373 succeeded! I will do another rebuild for all 3 archs to avoid ABI problems [1] on ppc and to make sure the latest filelist tweaks are in rawhide too. Thank you again for all your work on getting ghc and f15 working on ppc. :-) Jens [1] ghc needs to be built by the same version of ghc to avoid potential ABI breakage in a later rebuild.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 637360] Review Request: ghc-parameterized-data - Parameterized data library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '11

10 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637360 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-02-09 22:25:32 EST --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-parameterized-data-*.rpm ../ghc-parameterized-data.spec ghc-parameterized-data.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-parameterized-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-parameterized-data-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-parameterized-data-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-parameterized-data-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-parameterized-data-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-parameterized-data-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-parameterized-data-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/parameterized-data-0.1.5/libHSparameterized-data-0.1.5_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches License - OK, BSD 3 clause No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK, please use cabal2spec 0.22.4. Also you can enter ghc deps using ghc_pkg_deps macro (as per the template) Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Buildroot is ignored - present anyway. OK %clean is ignored - present anyway. OK Build Requires list - OK, Please use a ghc_pkg_deps macro to enter the deps (to adhere to the template). Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . BSD 3 clause license [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes LICENSE file included. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum parameterized-data-0.1.5.tar.gz fe332c77def5865a01fe3b1af9ec1b78 parameterized-data-0.1.5.tar.gz md5sum parameterized-data-0.1.5.tar.gz fe332c77def5865a01fe3b1af9ec1b78 parameterized-data-0.1.5.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on i686. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [NA]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro [NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. checked with rpmquery --list [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. checked with rpmquery --whatprovides [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. checked with ls -lR [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [NA]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-parameterized-data error: Failed dependencies: ghc-parameterized-data = 0.1.5-1.f13 is needed by (installed) ghc-parameterized-data-devel-0.1.5-1.f13.i686 rpm -e ghc-parameterized-data-devel error: Failed dependencies: ghc-parameterized-data-devel = 0.1.5-1.f13 is needed by (installed) ghc-parameterized-data-prof-0.1.5-1.f13.i686 [NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the packages. Imported Data.Param.FSVec into ghci.Works fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. APPROVED. Lower required version for ghc-rpm-macros to 0.7.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 671853] New: ghc-hslogger-1.1.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '11

09 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-hslogger-1.1.1 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671853 Summary: ghc-hslogger-1.1.1 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: ghc-hslogger AssignedTo: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com, lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 1.1.1 Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.1.0 URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hslogger/ Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '11

08 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc13 |ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '11

08 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-08 17:59:30 EST --- ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '11

08 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-02-08 17:57:52 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 652576] Review Request: ghc-texmath - Haskell texmathml library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '11

08 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652576 Bug 652576 depends on bug 648100, which changed state. Bug 648100 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xml - A simple XML library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648100 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-08 17:57:47 EST --- ghc-texmath-0.4-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 660617] Review Request: ghc-process-leksah - A library for dealing with system processes in leksah
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '11

08 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660617 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2011-02-08 02:48:30 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-02-08 02:48:30 EST --- Seems already to be in updates now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-process-leksah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630204] Review Request: ghc-mtlparse - Haskell mtlparse library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630204 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-mtlparse-0.1.1-1.fc13 |ghc-mtlparse-0.1.1-1.fc14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630204] Review Request: ghc-mtlparse - Haskell mtlparse library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '11

07 Feb '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630204 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-02-07 15:01:58 EST --- ghc-mtlparse-0.1.1-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel February 2011