[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712270] New: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Alias: ghc-derive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to
derive instances for data types
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647
rpmlint output:
derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Required for yi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 712280] New: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with
GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 710045
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec
SRPM link :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc1...
rpmlint output:
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Alias: ghc-cautious-file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to
write a file cautiously
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spe...
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec
ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit,
pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix
-> posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Alias: ghc-Diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in
Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredi...
SRPM file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 7 months