[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya Inscript keymap
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748
Subhransu Behera <arya.subhransu(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade(a)redhat.co
| |m)
--- Comment #6 from Subhransu Behera <arya.subhransu(a)gmail.com> 2008-11-11 08:05:47 EDT ---
Hi, as per community discussions, we think it will be good to have ZWJ and ZWNJ
in position
z/Z respectively in Inscript keymap layout.
The reason we want to go for it is because these keys are most frequently used
in English
key-map and currently have no characters in them. It will be quite simpler for
the end user
to use them in practice.
Beside that, these keys are used in combination with halanth (U+0B4D), and the
current
position of the same is 'd'. So it makes sense to have the JWZ/JWNJ in the
position of z/Z.
Can this issue be addressed and we can submit a patch for the next version?
Suggestions?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|Thabit-fonts from |arabeyes-thabit-fonts
|Arabeyes.org |
--- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-10 19:47:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora
> as my first fedora package
Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package.
> we need 3 font packages
> 1. KACST
kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-10 07:16:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > Thus I'd advise to
> > 1. keep your original rule
> > 2. add the one I just wrote
> > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
> > 4. test test test
>
> Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow.
Then does it work with 65? I thought I understood how fontconfig worked, but
maybe I'm just another confused user
> I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you
> because it's going to be EOL'd soon.
I'm rewriting all the templates anyway because of the number of multi-font
packages we've had to process lately
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) |
--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Nope, the rule I referenced would have been
>
> <alias>
> <family>HanaMin</family>
> <default>
> <family>serif</family>
> </default>
> </alias>
>
> The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja
> test.
Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :(
> The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after
> conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed
> before, so you can't use both in the same file :p
Ah, ok.
> Thus I'd advise to
> 1. keep your original rule
> 2. add the one I just wrote
> 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
> 4. test test test
Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow.
>
> > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9
> >
> > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
> > hereafter?
>
> It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as
> Fedora 8 in un-supported.
I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you
because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any
annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if
it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 6 months