November 2008 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] some web-page rendering is broken

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |stransky(a)redhat.com Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #12 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-10 06:47:15 EDT --- can we have this bug fixed in new xulrunner package built for F9 and F10 updates? SRPM is available at http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/firefox-3.0.x/xulrunner-1.9.0.2-6.fc10.src... I did koji scratch build also but not sure why it failed for x86_64 arch. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626 Bug 457626 depends on bug 468814, which changed state. Bug 468814 Summary: immodule selection behavior is unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] New: imsettings does not respect ~/.xinputrc in KDE

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: imsettings does not respect ~/.xinputrc in KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814 Summary: imsettings does not respect ~/.xinputrc in KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When running KDE imsettings seems to ignore ~/.xinputrc and always startup IM. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): imsettings-0.105.1-1.fc10 How reproducible: every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. login to rawhide KDE 2. run imsettings-info 3. run im-chooser and toggle IM state. 4. start a new Actual results: 1. SCIM is running (irrespective of session locale) 2. imsettings-info says "No IM running." 4. SCIM runs even if ".xinputrc -> none.conf". Expected results: 1. SCIM should only run for Asian locale 2. imsettings should reflect if SCIM is running. 4. SCIM should not run if IM is disabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
27
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-10 04:43:31 EDT --- qt-4.4.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-4.4.3-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-10 03:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe > License tag - > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html If you could convince spot to publish this on his "licenses approved for fonts use" wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway > > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle > > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be > > referenced in release notes > > Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake) > > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK > > fonts should be in the 65-69 range > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_l... > > > > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It > > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). > > I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for > Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's > the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if > someone could helps me. Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff. > > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use > > serif fonts to complete HanaMin > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names > > Fixed in the updated package. Nope, the rule I referenced would have been <alias> <family>HanaMin</family> <default> <family>serif</family> </default> </alias> The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja test. The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed before, so you can't use both in the same file :p Thus I'd advise to 1. keep your original rule 2. add the one I just wrote 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio 4. test test test > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 > > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing > hereafter? It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as Fedora 8 in un-supported. > Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec > SRPM URL: > http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc... Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in texttopaps

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(twaugh(a)redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-10 00:12:08 EDT --- Thank you for taking a review for this package. (In reply to comment #3) > 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, > you still need spot to approve it and put it on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe License tag - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be > referenced in release notes Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK > fonts should be in the 65-69 range > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_l... > > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if someone could helps me. > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use > serif fonts to complete HanaMin > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names Fixed in the updated package. > 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in > their next release once you're happy with it Sure. > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing hereafter? > 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) Sorry, missed one. fixed. > 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same > order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, > just take it into account for your next font package) Oh, wasn't aware of that. improved a bit in: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tcallawa(a)redhat.com | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-11-09 21:39:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass > > 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, > you still need spot to approve it and put it on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts See this https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to im-xim.so

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-09 18:12:05 EDT --- I forgot to say that step (4) requires adding a i386 repo but any i386 gtk app that supports immodules should be ok (ie not gtk-demo;). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-09 16:59:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Created an attachment (id=323014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) [details] > spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage Alsadi, as I stated on the list (and in this review) we do not do superpackages in Fedora, so if you want to propose spec files you need to propose one spec per font (ie 3 spec files), not a single spec that packages three different upstream archives in one go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs November 2008