November 2008 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo(a)redhat.com, | |tcallawa(a)redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-09 16:56:39 EDT --- Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok, you still need spot to approve it and put it on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be referenced in release notes (a wiki page template is available there http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template ) 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK fonts should be in the 65-69 range http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_l... Of course Behdad has the last say on this, so if you convince him to ok it I'll let this pass. 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there). 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use serif fonts to complete HanaMin http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in their next release once you're happy with it 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥ Fedora 9 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755) 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same order as in rpmdevtool's spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it, just take it into account for your next font package) All in all this was a pleasant spec file to review and I'll have no problem approving it once those little problems are taken care of → NEEDINFO in the meanwhile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-09 16:22:12 EDT --- BTW if the problem is that the current macros used in this package want to take a single font file as argument, then the subpackaging macro I wrote in dejavu yesterday could be used instead. I must admit I was thinking very hard about the un font packages when I wrote them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #28 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi(a)ojuba.org> 2008-11-09 11:05:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323015) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323015) font config configuration -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #27 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi(a)ojuba.org> 2008-11-09 11:05:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=323014) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi(a)ojuba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alsadi(a)ojuba.org --- Comment #26 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi(a)ojuba.org> 2008-11-09 11:03:56 EDT --- Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora as my first fedora package we need 3 font packages 1. KACST 2. core 3. decorative http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot as you case see they are already split by upstream http://cvs.arabeyes.org/viewcvs/art/khotot/ KACST is not developed by Arabeyes thus they need its own super package while core and decorative should be two subpackages of the same package the core fonts are missing the best font which is simplified naskhi, which can be downloaded from Araveyes fonts team leader and the designer of the fonts http://www.khaledhosny.org/filebrowser KACST's fonts are released under GPLv1 the decorative fonts are GPLv2 and the core fonts are OFL licensed I'll attach my .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-09 10:24:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I > am still waiting for a reply Please do not wait for OLPC to respond. Our packaging standards are higher than theirs, any any font package that passed Fedora review will just the OLPC package next time they rebase on a new Fedora version. Just do the requested fixes, so we can have a clean Fedora package OLPC can be referred to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya Inscript keymap

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2008-11-08 01:02:00 EDT --- ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9,m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9,m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9,m17... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup - Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-11-07 19:38:16 EDT --- So its been over four months since I made my comments with no response. I will close this ticket soon if there is no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459698] [ml_IN] Obsolete Malayalam patches in libicu-3.8.1-7.fc9

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459698 Caolan McNamara <caolanm(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs November 2008