❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel (ark)
by CKI Project
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark.git
Commit: a00f1c5f5a58 - [redhat] kernel-5.8.0-0.rc1.20200619git5e857ce6eae7.1
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Merge: OK
Compile: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
We attempted to compile the kernel for multiple architectures, but the compile
failed on one or more architectures:
aarch64: FAILED (see build-aarch64.log.xz attachment)
ppc64le: FAILED (see build-ppc64le.log.xz attachment)
s390x: FAILED (see build-s390x.log.xz attachment)
x86_64: FAILED (see build-x86_64.log.xz attachment)
We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Compile testing
---------------
We compiled the kernel for 4 architectures:
aarch64:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target aarch64 --with=cross --with=kabidw_base --without=bpftool --without=selftests --without=debug --without=ipaclones --without=perf --without=tools
ppc64le:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target ppc64le --with=cross --with=kabidw_base --without=bpftool --without=selftests --without=debug --without=ipaclones --without=perf --without=tools
s390x:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target s390x --with=cross --with=kabidw_base --without=bpftool --without=selftests --without=debug --without=ipaclones --without=perf --without=tools
x86_64:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target x86_64 --with=kabidw_base --without=debug
3 years, 10 months
[OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat/Makefile: Add fedora-configs and rh-configs
make
targets
by GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit(a)redhat.com>
There are times when I have to generate both Fedora and RHEL configs.
Add fedora-configs and rh-configs make targets.
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit(a)redhat.com>
---
redhat/Makefile | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile
index 32542936dd1f..ba9d278bf35a 100644
--- a/redhat/Makefile
+++ b/redhat/Makefile
@@ -141,6 +141,12 @@ dist-configs: dist-configs-prep
@cd $(REDHAT)/configs; VERSION=$(KVERSION) ./generate_all_configs.sh rhel 1; \
./process_configs.sh $(PROCESS_CONFIGS_OPTS) $(PACKAGE_NAME) $(KVERSION)
+fedora-configs: DIST_TARGET=fedora
+fedora-configs: dist-configs
+
+rh-configs: DIST_TARGET=rhel
+rh-configs: dist-configs
+
dist-configs-check: dist-configs-prep
cd $(REDHAT)/configs; ./process_configs.sh $(PROCESS_CONFIGS_CHECK_OPTS) $(PACKAGE_NAME)
--
GitLab
3 years, 10 months
[OS-BUILD PATCH] Move CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND into kernel
by GitLab Bridge on behalf of marcin348
From: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin(a)juszkiewicz.com.pl>
This kernel module is required by Panfrost driver on Arm platforms:
[ 66.412830] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: mali-t860 id 0x860 major 0x2 minor 0x0 status 0x0
[ 66.419978] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: features: 00000000,100e77bf, issues: 00000000,24040400
[ 66.427413] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: Features: L2:0x07120206 Shader:0x00000000 Tiler:0x00000809 Mem:0x1 MMU:0x00002830 AS:0xff JS:0x7
[ 66.449608] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: shader_present=0xf l2_present=0x1
[ 66.568406] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: devfreq_add_device: Unable to find governor for the device
[ 66.694867] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: [drm:panfrost_devfreq_init [panfrost]] *ERROR* Couldn't initialize GPU devfreq
[ 66.901972] panfrost ff9a0000.gpu: Fatal error during devfreq init
Without it board hangs here.
---
.../configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND
index ca7663b8301e..881ebdd7ee99 100644
--- a/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND
+++ b/redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND
@@ -1 +1 @@
-CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND=m
+CONFIG_DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND=y
--
GitLab
3 years, 10 months
✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.6.18-300.fc32 (fedora-32)
by CKI Project
Hello jforbes,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.6.18-300.fc32
Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45586119
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of
this message.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
aarch64:
Host 1:
⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
⚡⚡⚡ Boot test
⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - ext4
⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - xfs
⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
ppc64le:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
s390x:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
x86_64:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
✅ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
3 years, 10 months
✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.6.19-300.fc32 (fedora-32)
by CKI Project
Hello jforbes,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.6.19-300.fc32
Task URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=45828958
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of
this message.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
aarch64:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
ppc64le:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
s390x:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
✅ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
x86_64:
Host 1:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
✅ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
3 years, 10 months
❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.3-200.fc32 (fedora-32)
by CKI Project
Hello jforbes,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.7.3-200.fc32
COPR build ID: 1470174
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Tests: FAILED
One or more kernel tests failed:
x86_64:
❌ Boot test
❌ Boot test
❌ Boot test
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of
this message.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
x86_64:
Host 1:
❌ Boot test
⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test - as root
⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test - as user
⚡⚡⚡ LTP
⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity
⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create
⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
⚡⚡⚡ Networking bridge: sanity
⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity
⚡⚡⚡ Networking socket: fuzz
⚡⚡⚡ Networking: igmp conformance test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking route: pmtu
⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func - local
⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func - forward
⚡⚡⚡ Networking TCP: keepalive test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking UDP: socket
⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: gre basic
⚡⚡⚡ L2TP basic test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport
⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel
⚡⚡⚡ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
⚡⚡⚡ pciutils: sanity smoke test
⚡⚡⚡ pciutils: update pci ids test
⚡⚡⚡ ALSA PCM loopback test
⚡⚡⚡ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
⚡⚡⚡ storage: SCSI VPD
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ CIFS Connectathon
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ jvm - DaCapo Benchmark Suite
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ jvm - jcstress tests
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: kaslr
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking firewall: basic netfilter test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ audit: audit testsuite test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ trace: ftrace/tracer
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ kdump - kexec_boot
Host 2:
❌ Boot test
⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - ext4
⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - xfs
⚡⚡⚡ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing
⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ CPU: Frequency Driver Test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ CPU: Idle Test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IOMMU boot test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMI driver test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMItool loop stress test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ power-management: cpupower/sanity test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
Host 3:
❌ Boot test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ kdump - sysrq-c
Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
3 years, 10 months
✅ PASS: Test report for kernel 5.7.3-200.fc32 (fedora-32)
by CKI Project
Hello jforbes,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.7.3-200.fc32
COPR build ID: 1470174
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: PASSED
Tests: OK
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of
this message.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
x86_64:
Host 1:
⚡ Internal infrastructure issues prevented one or more tests (marked
with ⚡⚡⚡) from running on this architecture.
This is not the fault of the kernel that was tested.
✅ Boot test
✅ Podman system integration test - as root
✅ Podman system integration test - as user
✅ LTP
✅ Loopdev Sanity
✅ Memory function: memfd_create
✅ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
✅ Networking bridge: sanity
✅ Ethernet drivers sanity
✅ Networking socket: fuzz
✅ Networking: igmp conformance test
✅ Networking route: pmtu
✅ Networking route_func - local
✅ Networking route_func - forward
✅ Networking TCP: keepalive test
✅ Networking UDP: socket
✅ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
✅ Networking tunnel: gre basic
✅ L2TP basic test
✅ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport
✅ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel
✅ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
✅ pciutils: sanity smoke test
✅ pciutils: update pci ids test
✅ ALSA PCM loopback test
✅ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
✅ storage: SCSI VPD
🚧 ✅ CIFS Connectathon
🚧 ✅ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
🚧 ✅ jvm - DaCapo Benchmark Suite
🚧 ✅ jvm - jcstress tests
🚧 ✅ Memory function: kaslr
🚧 ✅ Networking firewall: basic netfilter test
🚧 ✅ audit: audit testsuite test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ trace: ftrace/tracer
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ kdump - kexec_boot
Host 2:
✅ Boot test
✅ xfstests - ext4
✅ xfstests - xfs
✅ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
✅ storage: software RAID testing
✅ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ✅ CPU: Frequency Driver Test
🚧 ✅ CPU: Idle Test
🚧 ✅ IOMMU boot test
🚧 ✅ IPMI driver test
🚧 ✅ IPMItool loop stress test
🚧 ✅ Storage blktests
Host 3:
✅ Boot test
🚧 ✅ kdump - sysrq-c
Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
3 years, 10 months
❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel (ark)
by CKI Project
Hello,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark.git
Commit: 3d1a0c62e94e - [redhat] kernel-5.8.0-0.rc1.20200618git1b5044021070.1
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Merge: OK
Compile: FAILED
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
We attempted to compile the kernel for multiple architectures, but the compile
failed on one or more architectures:
aarch64: FAILED (see build-aarch64.log.xz attachment)
ppc64le: FAILED (see build-ppc64le.log.xz attachment)
s390x: FAILED (see build-s390x.log.xz attachment)
x86_64: FAILED (see build-x86_64.log.xz attachment)
We hope that these logs can help you find the problem quickly. For the full
detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of this message.
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Compile testing
---------------
We compiled the kernel for 4 architectures:
aarch64:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target aarch64 --with=cross --with=kabidw_base --without=bpftool --without=selftests --without=debug --without=ipaclones --without=perf --without=tools
ppc64le:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target ppc64le --with=cross --with=kabidw_base --without=bpftool --without=selftests --without=debug --without=ipaclones --without=perf --without=tools
s390x:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target s390x --with=cross --with=kabidw_base --without=bpftool --without=selftests --without=debug --without=ipaclones --without=perf --without=tools
x86_64:
rpmbuild arguments: rpmbuild --target x86_64 --with=kabidw_base --without=debug
3 years, 10 months
❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.7.3-200.fc32 (fedora-32)
by CKI Project
Hello jforbes,
We ran automated tests on the following kernel build:
Kernel package: kernel-5.7.3-200.fc32
COPR build ID: 1470174
The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below)
Tests: FAILED
One or more kernel tests failed:
aarch64:
❌ Boot test
❌ Boot test
All kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawa...
Please reply to this email if you have any questions about the tests that we
ran or if you have any suggestions on how to make future tests more effective.
For the full detail on our testing procedures, please scroll to the bottom of
this message.
,-. ,-.
( C ) ( K ) Continuous
`-',-.`-' Kernel
( I ) Integration
`-'
______________________________________________________________________________
Hardware testing
----------------
We booted each kernel and ran the following tests:
aarch64:
Host 1:
❌ Boot test
⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - ext4
⚡⚡⚡ xfstests - xfs
⚡⚡⚡ selinux-policy: serge-testsuite
⚡⚡⚡ storage: software RAID testing
⚡⚡⚡ stress: stress-ng
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMI driver test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ IPMItool loop stress test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Storage blktests
Host 2:
❌ Boot test
⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test - as root
⚡⚡⚡ Podman system integration test - as user
⚡⚡⚡ LTP
⚡⚡⚡ Loopdev Sanity
⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: memfd_create
⚡⚡⚡ AMTU (Abstract Machine Test Utility)
⚡⚡⚡ Networking bridge: sanity
⚡⚡⚡ Ethernet drivers sanity
⚡⚡⚡ Networking socket: fuzz
⚡⚡⚡ Networking: igmp conformance test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking route: pmtu
⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func - local
⚡⚡⚡ Networking route_func - forward
⚡⚡⚡ Networking TCP: keepalive test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking UDP: socket
⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: geneve basic test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: gre basic
⚡⚡⚡ L2TP basic test
⚡⚡⚡ Networking tunnel: vxlan basic
⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns - transport
⚡⚡⚡ Networking ipsec: basic netns - tunnel
⚡⚡⚡ Libkcapi AF_ALG test
⚡⚡⚡ pciutils: update pci ids test
⚡⚡⚡ ALSA PCM loopback test
⚡⚡⚡ ALSA Control (mixer) Userspace Element test
⚡⚡⚡ storage: SCSI VPD
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ CIFS Connectathon
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ POSIX pjd-fstest suites
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ jvm - DaCapo Benchmark Suite
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ jvm - jcstress tests
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Memory function: kaslr
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ Networking firewall: basic netfilter test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ audit: audit testsuite test
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ trace: ftrace/tracer
🚧 ⚡⚡⚡ kdump - kexec_boot
Test sources: https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker
💚 Pull requests are welcome for new tests or improvements to existing tests!
Aborted tests
-------------
Tests that didn't complete running successfully are marked with ⚡⚡⚡.
If this was caused by an infrastructure issue, we try to mark that
explicitly in the report.
Waived tests
------------
If the test run included waived tests, they are marked with 🚧. Such tests are
executed but their results are not taken into account. Tests are waived when
their results are not reliable enough, e.g. when they're just introduced or are
being fixed.
Testing timeout
---------------
We aim to provide a report within reasonable timeframe. Tests that haven't
finished running yet are marked with ⏱.
3 years, 10 months
[OS-BUILD PATCH] genspec.sh: 'touch' empty Patchlist file for single
tarball
by GitLab Bridge on behalf of dzickusrh
From: Don Zickus <dzickus(a)redhat.com>
I was playing around with SINGLE_TARBALL=1 to workaround an issue and
noticed the patch for breaking out individual patches did not account
for that scenario.
The srpm fails to generate due to the missing Patchlist file, which
is used to track the individual patch files.
Fix this by creating a empty file to use or 'touch $SOURCES/Patchlist'.
This allows the srpm to package all the necessary files. I tested the
'prep' stage of rpmbuild and this empty file has no side effects.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus(a)redhat.com>
---
redhat/genspec.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/redhat/genspec.sh b/redhat/genspec.sh
index 79e71af04ee9..b72dffe14729 100755
--- a/redhat/genspec.sh
+++ b/redhat/genspec.sh
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ test -n "$SPECFILE" &&
s/%%DEBUG_BUILDS_ENABLED%%/$DEBUG_BUILDS_ENABLED/
s/%%TARBALL_VERSION%%/$TARFILE_RELEASE/" $SPECFILE
-
+touch $plistf
if [ "$SINGLE_TARBALL" = 0 ]; then
truncate -s 0 $plistf
COMMITS=$(git log --reverse --pretty=format:"%h" --no-merges "$MARKER".. \
--
GitLab
3 years, 10 months