On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:46 AM, David Airlie
<airlied(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Since I think we are trying to calm down the random gpu hacker commits to fedora
kernel, I said I'd let you guys do all the hard work,
Not exactly, but OK.
>
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux/commit/?h=qxl-fedora-queue&...
OK. I'll probably try and track down which sha1s those commits map to
at some point, but thanks for pulling them together in a single patch.
So I think they map to:
drm/qxl: prefer the monitor config resolution
(b080742393e2c19c603ccd651f10d58b32455749)
drm/qxl: remove unnecessary check (a40a60d912a101e8dfb08ee15eb02430aaf6112b)
drm/qxl: fix disabling extra monitors from client
(5cab51cb3381157e652bb85e3e87adb44497c672)
qxl: avoid an oops in the deferred io code.
(cc87509d87696d7cd393882f5dedea01e03e41a9)
drm/qxl: support 64bit surface bar (35541782dcc1e502d1864075eded7b3bb23b7268)
qxl: add a connector property to denote hotplug should rescan modes.
(4695b03970df378dcb93fe3e7158381f1e980fa2)
> I'd like to get that patch into as many fedora's as
possible, it seems to apply okay on 3.11 and 3.12 for me,
>
> They are all backports from drm-next that I wasn't game to stable yet but I think
we'd like in Fedora as they avoid some issues, they are also mostly in
<redacted> enterprise.
Is that the drm-next that's headed into 3.13 or 3.14? Merge window is
open right now, so it's not clear to me.
And I think those are all headed into 3.13, right?
josh