On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:09:26AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
On 08/18/14 at 01:24pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Hi Bao,
> Where is the patch. I only see changelog?
I used the "git format-patch -1 --cover-letter" to get patch and its
cover letter. Seems that it didn't add the patch0/1 and patch1/1
automatically. This is the cover letter produced by git.
Please see the other one in the same thread, it is the patch1/1.
I think you also need to use option -n so that your patches are numbered.
It is very important in a series. Otherwise it is very confusing.
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:34:52PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Previously for fixing the static route problem, all routes get through
> > a specific network interface will be saved and added in 2nd kernel.
> > Search pattern is used to get routes:
> > /sbin/ip route show | grep -v default | grep "^[[:digit:]].*via.*
> > An exception existed though, that is 2 machines connected directly and the
> > network interfaces wihch are configured as in different network subnets.
> > So in the v1 and v2, "ip route get to $target" command is executed
> > exact route to a target is saved and added in 2nd kernel. This works for
> > static route issue and can fix the corner case above.
> > v1:
> > Introduced the new way which get exact route to remote target.
> > v1->v2:
> > Since a grammer error which saved exact route, v2 is posted.
> > v2->v3:
> > Per Vivek's comment, route to target should not be related to
> > static ip issues. So in v3 introduced the get_routes function
> > and take it out of kdump_static_ip.
> > Baoquan He (1):
> > save exact route to remote target
> > dracut-module-setup.sh | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > --
> > 1.9.0
kexec mailing list