On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Ondrej Lichtner wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Jan Tluka wrote:
> Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 02:11:08PM CEST, csfakian(a)redhat.com wrote:
> >From: Christos Sfakianakis <csfakian(a)redhat.com>
> >Adding ported recipe RoundRobinBondRecipe, implementing old
> >regression_tests/phase1/round_robin_bond.xml.Its structure is
> >based on previously ported SimplePerfRecipe.
> Do we want to keep the round-robin recipes?
I think we might as well port it, I think I remember someone on internal
irc talking about trying to run the recipe... Whether or not we decide
to run it is a decision we can make outside of lnst upstream.
But on a different note, I think the ActiveBackup and RoundRobin
Bond/DoubleBond recipes can probably just be merged into a single Bond
and DoubleBond recipes, where the mode is just a parameter... I'll have
to oduble check but at first glance there's no other difference in their
Yes... that's the only difference so we should actually merge them to
reduce code duplication.
> LNST-developers mailing list -- lnst-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lnst-developers-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: