On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Ondrej Lichtner wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Jan Tluka wrote:
Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 02:11:08PM CEST, csfakian@redhat.com wrote:
From: Christos Sfakianakis csfakian@redhat.com
Adding ported recipe RoundRobinBondRecipe, implementing old regression_tests/phase1/round_robin_bond.xml.Its structure is based on previously ported SimplePerfRecipe.
Do we want to keep the round-robin recipes?
J.
I think we might as well port it, I think I remember someone on internal irc talking about trying to run the recipe... Whether or not we decide to run it is a decision we can make outside of lnst upstream.
But on a different note, I think the ActiveBackup and RoundRobin Bond/DoubleBond recipes can probably just be merged into a single Bond and DoubleBond recipes, where the mode is just a parameter... I'll have to oduble check but at first glance there's no other difference in their configuration.
Yes... that's the only difference so we should actually merge them to reduce code duplication.
-Ondrej _______________________________________________ LNST-developers mailing list -- lnst-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to lnst-developers-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/lnst-developers@lists.fedoraho...