----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Tluka" <jtluka(a)redhat.com>
To: "Christos Sfakianakis" <csfakian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: lnst-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 1:48:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next 3/5] lnst.Devices: add MacsecDevice
Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:40:09PM CEST, csfakian(a)redhat.com wrote:
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jan Tluka" <jtluka(a)redhat.com>
>> To: csfakian(a)redhat.com
>> Cc: lnst-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 12:19:05 PM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH-next 3/5] lnst.Devices: add MacsecDevice
>>
>> I've checked the 'ip link' man page and it's not clear what is
the
>> default value for encrypt parameter if not specified. It would be better
>> if this is explicit in LNST code, either on or off. Is this device
>> parameter mandatory (in LNST code)?
>>
>Ok, I will set this option as mandatory together with the 'realdev' option.
>
And remove the condition completely. Simply exec with encrypt + whatever
is passed as the device param.
S. Dubroca informed me that the kernel policy has a default value of
'off'
for 'encrypt' (so it is expected to stay so forever); I am therefore leaving
the code as is for now (after our talk).
> Thanks,
> Jan
> _______________________________________________
> LNST-developers mailing list -- lnst-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lnst-developers-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/lnst-developers@lists.fedora...
>