Re: [Fedora Robotics] Co-ordinating open source robotics packaging.

[Toby Collett]

Given that this list is relatively low volume and the material should be
mostly relevant do you think it is a good idea to just point people to this
list for discussions on robotics packaging in general?, or should I create a
new list (can probably host via sourceforge and the Player Project)

Toby

2009/6/9 Hedayat Vatankhah <hedayatv(a)gmail.com&gt;

>  Hi,
>  A good suggestion. For discussion, I agree with mailing list too. And also,
>  with wiki for others!
>  And about the matrix, that's OK. But a little note about RoboCup Soccer
>  Server: it is not one package. At least, it can be classified as two
>  packages RoboCup 2D soccer simulation server and RoboCup 3D soccer
>  simulation server (simspark). The development of the latter is now mostly
>  done here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/simspark/.
>
>  Thanks,
>  Hedayat
>
>  /*Toby Collett
> <[e-mail]&lt;tcollett%2Blists(a)plan9.net.nz&gt;&gt;*/
>  wrote on ‫سه‌شنبه ۰۹ ژوئن ۰۹، ۱۰:۴۰:۱۳‬:
>
> > I have had a bit of a look at creating the outline for the matrix. It is
> > pretty empty at the moment, but hopefully that will change over time.
> >
> > http://playerstage.sourceforge.net/wiki/LinuxRoboticsStudio
> >
> > Have a look and let me know what you think.
> >
> > Toby
> >
> > 2009/6/7 Attilio Priolo <attilio.priolo(a)gmail.com <mailto:
> > attilio.priolo(a)gmail.com&gt;&gt;
> >
> >    In my honest opinion I think that a common mailing list is a good
> >    mean but a wiki could be the best way to address our efforts. I
> >    vote for a wiki. ;-)
> >
> >    2009/6/7 Toby Collett
> <[e-mail]&lt;tcollett%2Blists(a)plan9.net.nz&gt;
> >    <mailto:[e-mail]<[e-mail]>
> > >>
> >
> >        Hi all,
> >        There seems to be increased effort and interest in packaging
> >        robotics software in various distributions. It seems to be
> >        that the requirements for most distributions are pretty
> >        similar and so it would make sense to put a bit of effort into
> >        coordinating these efforts, potentially targeting the same set
> >        of packages and same versions for fedora, ubuntu (coordinate
> >        with robobuntu?), debian ....
> >
> >        Does this seem a good idea for others, I am currently looking
> >        to get involved in some ubuntu packaging (particularly around
> >        player which I am a developer for and the libraries it uses
> >        such as gearbox), but would prefer to not reinvent the wheel
> >        too much :)
> >
> >        If this seems a good idea, what do you think would be the best
> >        way to coordinate, a common mailing list, a wiki with a matrix
> >        of packages, distributions and the versions targetted?....
> >
> >        Regards,
> >        Toby Collett
> >        --        This email is intended for the addressee only and may
> > contain
> >        privileged and/or confidential information
> >
> >        _______________________________________________
> >        Fedora-robotics-list mailing list
> >        Fedora-robotics-list(a)redhat.com
> >        <mailto:[e-mail]>
> >        https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-robotics-list
> >
> >
> >
> >    _______________________________________________
> >    Fedora-robotics-list mailing list
> >    Fedora-robotics-list(a)redhat.com
> >    <mailto:[e-mail]>
> >    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-robotics-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged
> > and/or confidential information
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fedora-robotics-list mailing list
> > Fedora-robotics-list(a)redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-robotics-list
> >
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Fedora-robotics-list mailing list
>  Fedora-robotics-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-robotics-list
>  


-- 
This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged
and/or confidential information