-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
-----------------------------------------------------------
What about rolekit use within anaconda? Wouldn’t it be cleaner to modify the installers
not to start the servers, instead?
- Miloslav Trmac
On Led. 20, 2015, 2:19 odp., Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-fedoraserver.rhcloud.com/r/124/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Led. 20, 2015, 2:19 odp.)
Review request for RoleKit Mailing List, Miloslav Trmac, Stephen Gallagher, Simo Sorce,
and Thomas Woerner.
Bugs: 31 and 35
https://fedorahosted.org/rolekit/ticket/31
https://fedorahosted.org/rolekit/ticket/35
Repository: rolekit
Description
-------
Many server installers will automatically start their services as
soon as installation is complete (such as FreeIPA). This means that
the real state of the system will disagree with rolekit's view of
it. To be sure that we are aligned, it makes the most sense to just
ensure that all roles are deployed into the RUNNING state.
Diffs
-----
src/rolekit/server/rolebase.py 7f960bf41206c2552996936839a100325382e3be
Diff:
http://reviewboard-fedoraserver.rhcloud.com/r/124/diff/
Testing
-------
Deployed a domain controller and verified that after deployment, 'rolectl status
domaincontroller/teeceetwo.sgallagh.rht' reported "running" and
'systemctl status role-domaincontroller-teeceetwo.sgallagh.rht.target' reported
"active".
Thanks,
Stephen Gallagher