Dan Horák wrote:
Harold Grovesteen píše v Út 15. 12. 2009 v 05:54 -0600:
>Dan Horák wrote:
>
>
>
>>Harold Grovesteen píše v Pá 11. 12. 2009 v 10:26 -0600:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>This was posted on the Hercules list by a fairly frustrated Hercules
>>>user. Can anyone shed some light?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Harold Grovesteen
>>>
>>>-------- Original Message --------
>>>Subject: [hercules-390] Re: Hercules Issues with Fedora 11 S390X
>>>Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:39:24 -0000
>>>From: halfmeg <opplr(a)hotmail.com>
>>>Reply-To: hercules-390(a)yahoogroups.com
>>>To: hercules-390(a)yahoogroups.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>I wasn't having the issue, but halfmeg was. It will let him know that
>you provided a response here.
>
>
halfmeg was on CC, so he should receive the reply directly
>One question, when you finally have distribution media will you continue
>to build the pre-installed disk image? That was useful to me. Although
>I have not had much opportunity to work with it since, it got me
>started. I was frustrated some time back when Debian ceased to build a
>disk image for Hercules. Novell never did, nor did Centos, nor did
>RHEL. I hope you will continue to provide at least a basic disk image
>for the Hercules community as a starter system. That same system could
>be used on VM with the AWSUTIL packages of Hercules.
>
>
Yes, we will provide the pre-installed images because it's the simplest
way for people to step in. When I did the quite minimal installation of
RHEL 5.x in Hercules last time it took 5+ hours to complete IIRC. Plus
the fact that devices and network must be set correctly for a successful
installation it will really be better to distribute also the
pre-installed image.
Dan
Precisely. This is the first Linux distro to acknowledge these hurdles
and address them with Hercules. BTW, I don't believe those challenges
are any different with the real big iron installs.
Harold