On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 06:29:58PM -0600, Clint Savage wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Bryan Kearney
<bkearney(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Bryan Kearney wrote:
>>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>>>> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>>>>> I'm late and not as educated a remixer myself. ??I'm
running a
>>>>>> livecd-creator process right now to see what happens in the
generic-*
>>>>>> case. ??Would it make sense to have the Fedora Remix logos
appear in
>>>>>> the generic-logos package by default?
>>>>>>
>>>>> In my opinion, we should have a generic package that just debrands.
>>>> Don't we have already have that with generic-logos? My opinion is
that
>>>> by making available fedora-remix-logos, we can encourage remixes to
give
>>>> Fedora credit which is the whole point of the secondary brand.
>>>>
>>>> Rahul
>>> Yes.. so three logo packages, and you only include one:
>>>
>>> fedora-logos
>>> generic-logos
>>> fedora-remix-logos
>
> I am saying I agree :)
>
> -- bk
Okay,
so I am not sure if we've decided or not to have this package in
place, but I'd like to offer to create the logo package. The reason I
want to do this, is to learn where the logos go in the filesystem. I
plan on continuing to present Fedora Remix at Conferences and LUG
meetings as much as possible and feel it would be good to help this
effort. Plus this will be quite an easy package to create as it's
just a matter of figuring out where to install the images and some
documentation.
I hope I'm not out of line and would be able to put this in place
pretty quickly.
Fantastic, Clint -- great way to step up to the plate.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug