On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:02:35 +0100
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2009, 08:44 -0500 schrieb Adam Miller:
> The whole midori vs. firefox thing I'm not entirely up in arms
> about, but I think it would be nice to try and offer Midori some
> exposure since it is considered an Xfce application at this point.
Agreed. Note that I use midori in the LXDE spin.
> parole I'm also mostly neutral on but if we are going to toss Midori
> due to redundant applications it would seem hypocritical to include
> parole if we already have a media player.
Also agreed. Ether both or none. I'd say both and consider Midori and
Parole tech previews.
yeah, that seems reasonable to me.
But IMO the situation is a little different: Modiri is not yet
complete, it lacks important features like cache (yes, really)
disk cache has been implemented in git head. ;)
ad filters are in now.
The other major thing I can think of lacking currently is ability to
use the java plugins.
and wont work with a couple of well known websites.
Really? What sites?
kevin