On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:56:01AM -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Ian Weller<ian(a)ianweller.org>
wrote:
> Every now and then I run across something that is obviously not
> compatible. I don't touch it because there's no obvious licensing
Huh? This doesn't make any sense - the wiki and docs.fp.o are licensed
OPL, and always has been (for the last three years - always in my book
:) ). AFAIK, we're talking about relicensing the wiki, the docs on
docs.fp.o, and contemporaneously, RHT relicensing their upstream docs
to CC-BY-SA (which seems perfectly reasonable to me).
If you put something in the wiki that *isn't yours* it doesn't magically
follow our licensing rules. People do that, either because they don't
understand the licensing or because they don't read the guidelines.
--
Ian Weller <ian(a)ianweller.org>
GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36