-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bryan Kearney wrote:
>> This patch exposes adding images into cobbler via the ruby
bindings.
>> It seems like the "new", iterates over attributes, "save"
model is
>> standard across the various elements. Any reason we can not push the
>> save method up?
> The main reason for not being able to push save functionality up to
> Cobbler::Base is due to the differences in field names when saving and
> retrieving. For example, when retrieving a NetworkInterface, the MAC
> address is delivered with "mac_address" but is called
"macaddress" on save.
Why is that? Is it an xmlrpc feature, or a cobbler feature?
The field name discrepancy is something in Cobbler itself.
- --
Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce(a)redhat.com> : GPG KEYID: 6C4E7F1B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkkCEy0ACgkQjaT4DmxOfxvX7wCg68CEQIrAkrfNSjRgmmUIynZI
ROcAn1YV81iIYq09vY4iE1eQR1OISp8A
=P3sM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----