disable networking in Copr by default
by Pavel Raiskup
Just to be more pedantic and probably bit more secure, what about making
networking in copr opt-in (at least for new projects)?
If build of my package used internet arbitrarily, I would be warned very
early..
Also, in Koji we also do not have networking, so we can faster teach
(future) Fedora packagers.
Thanks for considering,
Pavel
7 years, 8 months
New version of Copr (includes dist-git)
by Miroslav Suchý
It is my pleasure to announce that we just upgraded
https://copr.fedoraproject.org
It includes several major improvements:
* UI converted to PatternFly [1]. Most visible change is that tables
(e.g. list of builds) can be sorted using any column and you can filter
visible rows using any value.
* dist-git support -- We store your SRPM in dist-git now. It is not
accessible directly using fedpkg (it is in plan later). Dist-git is
browsable via cgit [2]. This allows us to offer you upload of SRPM
directly from your workstation. Just navigate to:
New Build -> Upload SRPM
or if you upgrade to python-copr-1.58-1 (submitted to updates just
today) then you can do:
copr-cli build name/project ./some.src.rpm
While we assume that uploading SRPM will be most popular method, we
preserved option to pass SRPM url.
You can see new state of your build - "Importing". It is obviously the
moment when we import your SRPM into dist-git.
* In project properties (Edit tab) you can now add you email if you want
to be contacted by users in case of some problems with your project.
* We improved queue handling of various architectures. This should fix
those long waiting time of PPC64LE builds.
[1] https://www.patternfly.org/
[2] http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/
Mirek Suchý
7 years, 11 months
Re: F23: Copr build failure: glibc
by Sérgio Basto
Hi, redirecting to copr-devel
On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 15:15 +0200, Rajeesh K V wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error:
> >
> > Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> >
> > For instance see the build log
> > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-k
> > de-apps/fedora-23-x86_64/plasma-volume-control-5.3.90-1.fc22/root.log
> >
> >
>
>
> Known issue, should be fixed later today when Bodhi is activated for
> Fedora 23.
I still have those failures in fedora-23-ppc64le [1] and
fedora-rawhide-ppc64le buildroots .
Should we open bug reports in bugzilla , product Copr [3] ?
[1]
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/patchutils_with_...
DEBUG util.py:377: Error: Package tar-1.28-6.fc23.ppc64le.rpm is not
signed
[2]
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/patchutils_with_...
DEBUG util.py:377: Error: nothing provides libsemanage.so.1()(64bit)
needed by shadow-utils-2:4.2.1-2.fc23.ppc64le.
DEBUG util.py:377: nothing provides libsemanage.so.1()(64bit) needed by shadow-utils-2:4.2.1-2.fc23.ppc64le
DEBUG util.py:488: Child return code was: 1
[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Copr
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
8 years, 1 month
