10:47 a.m.
I was thinking about the cli tool we want, now that we have the api in
place to make it possible to submit from a cli.
to start with I was thinking of a simple tool that did a small number of
basic commands:
create coprname -r distro -r distro -r distro -a arch -a arch
--repo=somerepo --repo=somerepo -p pkgurl1 -p pkgurl2
-p pkgurl3
edit coprname (not sure what this would do yet)
info coprname (dumps out info like the returned urls of builds, number of
builds, etc)
build coprname pkgurl1 pkgurl2 pkgurl3
delete coprname
What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
-sv
10:55 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On 01/11/2013 10:47 AM, Seth Vidal wrote:
I was thinking about the cli tool we want, now that we have the api
in
place to make it possible to submit from a cli.
to start with I was thinking of a simple tool that did a small number of
basic commands:
create coprname -r distro -r distro -r distro -a arch -a arch
--repo=somerepo --repo=somerepo -p pkgurl1 -p pkgurl2
-p pkgurl3
edit coprname (not sure what this would do yet)
info coprname (dumps out info like the returned urls of builds, number of
builds, etc)
build coprname pkgurl1 pkgurl2 pkgurl3
delete coprname
What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
-sv
That is everything I want, and more.
Troy
12:53 p.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Seth Vidal wrote:
I was thinking about the cli tool we want, now that we have the api
in place
to make it possible to submit from a cli.
to start with I was thinking of a simple tool that did a small number of
basic commands:
create coprname -r distro -r distro -r distro -a arch -a arch
--repo=somerepo --repo=somerepo -p pkgurl1 -p pkgurl2
-p pkgurl3
edit coprname (not sure what this would do yet)
info coprname (dumps out info like the returned urls of builds, number of
builds, etc)
build coprname pkgurl1 pkgurl2 pkgurl3
delete coprname
What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
Expanding on this a bit - I suspect that info coprname would dump out a
json blob with that info so it can be easily parsed.
I was trying to think of the workflow:
coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a x86_64
coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for something_or_another
does that make sense?
-sv
2:27 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Seth Vidal wrote:
>I was thinking about the cli tool we want, now that we have the
>api in place to make it possible to submit from a cli.
>
>
>to start with I was thinking of a simple tool that did a small
>number of basic commands:
>
>create coprname -r distro -r distro -r distro -a arch -a arch
> --repo=somerepo --repo=somerepo -p pkgurl1 -p pkgurl2
> -p pkgurl3
>edit coprname (not sure what this would do yet)
>info coprname (dumps out info like the returned urls of builds, number of
> builds, etc)
>build coprname pkgurl1 pkgurl2 pkgurl3
>delete coprname
>
>
>What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
>
That's awesome, I think its right on the money.
Expanding on this a bit - I suspect that info coprname would dump
out a json blob with that info so it can be easily parsed.
I was trying to think of the workflow:
coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a x86_64
coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for something_or_another
does that make sense?
Makes sense, this is great. Kudos!
+1
-AdamM
12:30 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
----- Original Message -----
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Seth Vidal wrote:
> I was thinking about the cli tool we want, now that we have the api
> in place
> to make it possible to submit from a cli.
>
>
> to start with I was thinking of a simple tool that did a small
> number of
> basic commands:
>
> create coprname -r distro -r distro -r distro -a arch -a arch
> --repo=somerepo --repo=somerepo -p pkgurl1 -p pkgurl2
> -p pkgurl3
> edit coprname (not sure what this would do yet)
> info coprname (dumps out info like the returned urls of builds,
> number of
> builds, etc)
> build coprname pkgurl1 pkgurl2 pkgurl3
> delete coprname
>
>
> What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
>
Expanding on this a bit - I suspect that info coprname would dump
out a
json blob with that info so it can be easily parsed.
I was trying to think of the workflow:
coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a
x86_64
coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
something_or_another
does that make sense?
-sv
It's on my TODO list to do a cli client. It will require some new views (or perhaps
just altering the current views) and the cli client itself. Since I finished the most
pressing stuff last week, I'll get on it ASAP.
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
10:08 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>
>> What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
>>
>
> Expanding on this a bit - I suspect that info coprname would dump
> out a
> json blob with that info so it can be easily parsed.
>
>
> I was trying to think of the workflow:
>
> coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a
> x86_64
> coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
> coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
> something_or_another
>
> does that make sense?
>
> -sv
>
It's on my TODO list to do a cli client. It will require some new views
(or perhaps just altering the current views) and the cli client itself.
Since I finished the most pressing stuff last week, I'll get on it ASAP.
Slavek,
which part is on your todo list? I was playing with cli tool itself -
just option/arg/env parsing and general layout. If you want to focus on
the views necessary to make the tool work first that might be a good place
to start? If you'd rather work on the cli-piece first just let me know.
Thanks,
-sv
12:35 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
----- Original Message -----
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>>
>>> What do you think? Too broad? not broad enough?
>>>
>>
>> Expanding on this a bit - I suspect that info coprname would dump
>> out a
>> json blob with that info so it can be easily parsed.
>>
>>
>> I was trying to think of the workflow:
>>
>> coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a
>> x86_64
>> coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
>> coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
>> something_or_another
>>
>> does that make sense?
>>
>> -sv
>>
>
> It's on my TODO list to do a cli client. It will require some new
> views
> (or perhaps just altering the current views) and the cli client
> itself.
> Since I finished the most pressing stuff last week, I'll get on it
> ASAP.
Slavek,
which part is on your todo list? I was playing with cli tool itself
-
just option/arg/env parsing and general layout. If you want to focus
on
the views necessary to make the tool work first that might be a good
place
to start? If you'd rather work on the cli-piece first just let me
know.
Thanks,
-sv
Hey Seth,
I'd like to start with the views, so how about I create a document describing the API
and then we'll implement our parts? So the cli is all yours, if you want to take it :)
(I'm currently working on other functionality, but I suppose I could have something by
the end of the week.)
Slavek.
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
9:12 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hey Seth, I'd like to start with the views, so how about I create a
document describing the API and then we'll implement our parts? So the
cli is all yours, if you want to take it :) (I'm currently working on
other functionality, but I suppose I could have something by the end of
the week.)
Slavek,
I am leaving for fudcon on thursday so I won't have too much time but I'll
work on it after I work on the talks.
I'm going to try to recruit more people to work on coprs at fudcon. :)
-sv
11:49 p.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:12:13AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
I'm going to try to recruit more people to work on coprs at
fudcon. :)
Hi,
I have had a little time to play with copr and tried to start working on the
CLI. I am at the point that I think we will not be able to write down a CLI with
the actual structure.
We are using web forms which are csrf protected and the goal of csrf is pretty
much to ensure that a user is following a given path which is what we want to
circumvent with the CLI.
So I am proposing that we build a /api/ which would expose the different
possibilities that we described:
- list the coprs of a user
- create a new copr
- build a copr
- ...
I'll see if I get the time and courage to work on this in the airplane tomorrow,
if I do, I'll send the patch here for review rather than pushing directly.
Pierre
12:27 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
----- Original Message -----
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:12:13AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> I'm going to try to recruit more people to work on coprs at fudcon.
> :)
Hi,
I have had a little time to play with copr and tried to start working
on the
CLI. I am at the point that I think we will not be able to write down
a CLI with
the actual structure.
We are using web forms which are csrf protected and the goal of csrf
is pretty
much to ensure that a user is following a given path which is what we
want to
circumvent with the CLI.
So I am proposing that we build a /api/ which would expose the
different
possibilities that we described:
- list the coprs of a user
- create a new copr
- build a copr
- ...
Yep, that was my idea. I never meant to use current views for both web and cli. That's
why I created the "copr.logic" package that is aimed to provide the
functionality common to both web and cli-api views. It's not optimal ATM, but I guess
we will figure out the best approach when we actually start working on the cli-api.
I was thinking of a simple REST cli-client + JSON answers from the server - or do you want
to do it differently?
I'll see if I get the time and courage to work on this in the
airplane tomorrow,
if I do, I'll send the patch here for review rather than pushing
directly.
Great, looking forward to it :)
Pierre
_______________________________________________
copr-devel mailing list
copr-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/copr-devel
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
8:03 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:27:25AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> So I am proposing that we build a /api/ which would expose the
> different
> possibilities that we described:
> - list the coprs of a user
> - create a new copr
> - build a copr
> - ...
>
Yep, that was my idea. I never meant to use current views for both web and cli.
That's why I created the "copr.logic" package that is aimed to provide the
functionality common to both web and cli-api views. It's not optimal ATM, but I guess
we will figure out the best approach when we actually start working on the cli-api.
I was thinking of a simple REST cli-client + JSON answers from the server - or do you
want to do it differently?
Great, we're on the same page then :)
Pierre
10:58 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a
x86_64
Ok so this is implemented API side and CLI side.
coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
I just sent patches for this on the API side, I still have to do the CLI part
but it should be pretty straight forward.
coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
something_or_another
What's the idea behind this one?
Returning raw json? Or just giving information about a copr (owner, chroots,
packages (?), builds (I have no real idea of what we can/display))?
Thanks,
Pierre
4:37 p.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 17:58 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a x86_64
Ok so this is implemented API side and CLI side.
> coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
I just sent patches for this on the API side, I still have to do the CLI part
but it should be pretty straight forward.
> coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for something_or_another
What's the idea behind this one?
Returning raw json? Or just giving information about a copr (owner, chroots,
packages (?), builds (I have no real idea of what we can/display))?
Seth?
BTW, I wanted to look at cliff because pkwat uses it and it seems pretty
cool. Now that I have seen it, I have the feeling that it does not quite
fit our use-case and it nicely adds a dependency and a layer of
complexity when developing the application.
If I rewrite the cli to a more common argparse based CLI, anything
against?
Pierre
12:42 a.m.
New subject: coprclitool
----- Original Message -----
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 17:58 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a
> > x86_64
>
> Ok so this is implemented API side and CLI side.
>
> > coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
>
> I just sent patches for this on the API side, I still have to do
> the CLI part
> but it should be pretty straight forward.
>
> > coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
> > something_or_another
>
> What's the idea behind this one?
> Returning raw json? Or just giving information about a copr (owner,
> chroots,
> packages (?), builds (I have no real idea of what we can/display))?
Seth?
BTW, I wanted to look at cliff because pkwat uses it and it seems
pretty
cool. Now that I have seen it, I have the feeling that it does not
quite
fit our use-case and it nicely adds a dependency and a layer of
complexity when developing the application.
If I rewrite the cli to a more common argparse based CLI, anything
against?
No problem on my side, use whatever suits you best.
Pierre
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
2:18 p.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 17:58 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:53:49PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
>> coprcli create mycopr -r epel-5 -r epel-6 -r fedora-18 -a i386 -a x86_64
>
> Ok so this is implemented API side and CLI side.
>
>> coprcli build mycopr pkg1 pkg2 pkg3
>
> I just sent patches for this on the API side, I still have to do the CLI part
> but it should be pretty straight forward.
>
>> coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for something_or_another
>
> What's the idea behind this one?
> Returning raw json? Or just giving information about a copr (owner, chroots,
> packages (?), builds (I have no real idea of what we can/display))?
Seth?
BTW, I wanted to look at cliff because pkwat uses it and it seems pretty
cool. Now that I have seen it, I have the feeling that it does not quite
fit our use-case and it nicely adds a dependency and a layer of
complexity when developing the application.
If I rewrite the cli to a more common argparse based CLI, anything
against?
As long as it will run on rhel6 - I think it's fine. And if it only runs
on rhel6 with something from epel - that's fine too.
I'm sorry for being AWOL for the last week or so. I've been completely
covered up by the euca upgrade disaster.
For the future this is the only rule to follow with regard to waiting on a
reply from me:
DO NOT BLOCK ON SETH.
If I complain about something you did following the above rule, refer me
to that rule and I will grumble and then promptly shut up.
You are doing great work, do not wait for me to continue to do so.
-sv
2:36 p.m.
New subject: coprclitool
Le vendredi 15 février 2013 à 15:18 -0500, Seth Vidal a écrit :
You are doing great work, do not wait for me to continue to do so.
I did not block on you, you did not block anything, but I can make sure
to blame you for not working on this in the train where I was the last
few hours if you like :)
No I was just wondering what you had in mind with this part, that you
mentioned when you first spoke about the CLI tool:
coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
something_or_another
It is something like
$ coprcli info foo
Name: foo
Description: bar
...
last 5 builds:
...
Or did you have something else in mind (which I tend to think based on
the succession of pipes you added) ?
Thanks :)
Pierre
3:18 p.m.
New subject: coprclitool
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Le vendredi 15 février 2013 à 15:18 -0500, Seth Vidal a écrit :
> You are doing great work, do not wait for me to continue to do so.
I did not block on you, you did not block anything, but I can make sure
to blame you for not working on this in the train where I was the last
few hours if you like :)
No I was just wondering what you had in mind with this part, that you
mentioned when you first spoke about the CLI tool:
> coprcli info mycopr | python -m json.tool | check for
something_or_another
It is something like
$ coprcli info foo
Name: foo
Description: bar
...
last 5 builds:
...
Or did you have something else in mind (which I tend to think based on
the succession of pipes you added) ?
I'm fine with info outputting something trivially human readable.
I can just see what a user might end up doing with it.
<create copr>
<submit build 1>
<check build status in a loop using info and a series of horrible grep
pipes :)>
<submit build 2>
<check build status in a loop using coprcli info>
<get url of results from coprcli info>
<use reposync to pull down all the pkgs to a local repo>
I guess I thought to make the json simple to access so we could keep
people from using grep and ultimately making our life harder :)
-sv
4095
days inactive
4130
days old
copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
16 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Adam Miller -
Bohuslav Kabrda -
Pierre-Yves Chibon -
Seth Vidal -
Troy Dawson