September 2013 - Design Suite - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1005906] Review Request: heisenbug-kde-theme - Heisenbug KDE Theme

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005906 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- kde-settings-20-1.fc20,schroedinger-cat-kde-theme-18.91.6-2.fc20,heisenbug-kde-theme-19.90.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-settings-20-1.fc20,schroeding... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Rppe9vgSGC&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1005906] Review Request: heisenbug-kde-theme - Heisenbug KDE Theme

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005906 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ikeq2fwACi&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1005906] Review Request: heisenbug-kde-theme - Heisenbug KDE Theme

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005906 --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> --- This is not heisenbug-backgrounds review. Change request should go to the right review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tKBUPVQrS0&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1006041] Review Request: heisenbug-backgrounds - Heisenbug desktop backgrounds

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006041 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- heisenbug-backgrounds-19.90.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/heisenbug-backgrounds-19.90.0-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the reporter of the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JoyEFej720&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1006041] Review Request: heisenbug-backgrounds - Heisenbug desktop backgrounds

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006041 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the reporter of the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8cAxqaWk8D&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 994859] Review Request: python-pygit2 - Python bindings for libgit2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859 --- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> --- Spec URL: http://cicku.me/python-pygit2.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/python-pygit2-0.19.0-4.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the reporter of the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 994859] Review Request: python-pygit2 - Python bindings for libgit2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #10) > * The shared libs MUST be executable, or else the automated -debuginfo [cut] Replied in mailing list, thanks! > * "BuildRequires: python-sphinx" is missing. This has been fixed in my local spec, I haven't uploaded it. Thanks again!(Nice help!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the reporter of the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 994859] Review Request: python-pygit2 - Python bindings for libgit2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994859 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> --- * The shared libs MUST be executable, or else the automated -debuginfo package generation and stripping of the files would not work. It's a packaging mistake to make them mode 0644. * Run rpmlint (or rpmlint -i for more helpful output) on the src.rpm and all built rpms. Feel free to ignore obvious false positives in the report, but fix anything else. Preferably add a comment here about whether/when you think what rpmlint reports is correct or incorrect. * "BuildRequires: python-sphinx" is missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the reporter of the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1003694] Review Request: python-w3lib - Library of web-related functions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003694 Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt(a)gmail.com> --- Seems you've corrected them, nice. 1. CLEAN rm -rf %{buildroot} IN %install SECTION BEFORE SCM. 2. python-w3lib.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US unicode -> Unicode, uni code, uni-code APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1006197] Review Request: stockfish - Powerful open source chess engine

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006197 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> --- * Run rpmlint (or rpmlint -i for more helpful output) on the src.rpm and all built rpms. Feel free to ignore obvious false positives in the report, but fix anything else. Preferably add a comment here about whether/when you think what rpmlint reports is correct or incorrect. > %setup -q -n %{upstream_name}-%{upstream_short_name}_%{version} > > unzip %{SOURCE1} %setup can unzip, too. You don't need a second line for that. Use: %setup -q -a 1 -n %{upstream_name}-%{upstream_short_name}_%{version} > 2. %{_var} should be %{_localstatedir} Giving a rationale/explanation would be more helpful. We don't use macros just for fun. Nothing during the build uses %{_localstatedir}. The %configure macro isn't used either (it would pass --localstatedir=/var to the build framework). So, using %{_var} is fine, but only provided that you use it consistently. The sed substitution uses a hardcoded /var, so I would either use /var or %{_var} everywhere, but not mix them. > %build That section currenly only supports a few architectures and doesn't call make for unknown archs. ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch usage is missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support > install -m 644 Book.bin $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_var}/lib/games/%{name} To be verified. Is that path correct? The Polyglot .ini file contains a /usr/share/games/stockfish/Book.bin path. Also consider contacting the Fedora Games SIG, since they tell that runtime configuration files should go in /var/games/%{name} instead. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games -> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Design Suite September 2013