Design Suite September 2013

design-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
124 discussions

[Bug 1004257] Review Request: pudb - console-based Python debugger

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004257 --- Comment #21 from Dhiru Kholia <dkholia(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #20) > ah! sorry it should be %{python2_sitelib}. Its new guidelines change. See > /etc/rpm/macros.python2 Fixed now. Spec URL: https://bitbucket.org/dhiru/packages/raw/master/pudb/python-pudb.spec SRPM URL: https://bitbucket.org/dhiru/packages/raw/master/pudb/python-pudb-2013.3.6... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5916981 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Does CC-ing for packages work?

by Martin Sourada

Accidentaly sent under my gmail account. Resending. Hi luya, I was wondering -- is there any way for all the Design-SW SIG members to be automagically CCed in bugzilla for any design-sw related software? Like adding a specific user (like design-sw or design-maintainers?) to pkgdb that would forward mails to all members? If not, are you planing to enable it? I think it would really help with our productivity. Thanks, Martin PS: On a completely irrelevant topic, sorry for hijacking, but I'm kindy busy and lazy at the same time to make a separate message. Should the design-sw sig take care of wallpaper wiki pages? If I don't make them, usually nobody does, and its kinda wrong to have currently non-existing F20_artwork page referenced in the heisenbug-backgrounds package :( Maybe a generic template would speed up the process.

10 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 913289] Review Request: gimp-separate+ - A plug-in providing rudimentary CMYK support for The GIMP

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913289 --- Comment #31 from Peter Hanecak <hany(a)hany.sk> --- (In reply to Design Software from comment #30) <shortened> > You can drop the bundled sRGB_type2.icc from the package. If the plug-in > searches in /usr/share/color/icc/ and subdirectory, then colord is not > required (Notice sRGB from OpenICC). In that case, 'Requires color' is > unneeded. > > Other than these corrections, the package is ready for approval. OK, done: I've removed sRGB_type2.icc from the package. http://hanecak.fedorapeople.org/gimp-separate+.spec http://hanecak.fedorapeople.org/gimp-separate+-0.5.8-8.fc18.src.rpm I'm still looking for sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3fOWW4D7es&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

test

by Luya Tshimbalanga

test

10 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Design Suite September 2013