docs-qa June 2018

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
19 discussions

[Bug 1596438] New: Missing `fedpkg request-branch`
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Jun '18

28 Jun '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596438 Bug ID: 1596438 Summary: Missing `fedpkg request-branch` Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: amahdal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Description of problem ====================== In Join_the_package_collection_maintainers, the step "Import, commit, and build your package" is directly followed by "Update Your Branches (if desired)", and "Submit Package as Update in Bodhi". https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=P… However the step "update branches" cannot succeed, since branches are not created automatically. Sure, this step is optional, but even opting out, the next step about Bodhi won't be valid, because pushing master to Bodhi is not allowed. Easiest fix would be to add command such as `fedpkg request-branch f28`, as I've been advised on mailing list and IRC: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… One more note: to new packager, it's not clear if they should "desire" to update/push to new branches; because new packager might not expect this (adding new package to already released branch) to be allowed by policy. It would be nice to give a hint to the packager on this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1595275] New: please add TOC of page's sections
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 Jun '18

26 Jun '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595275 Bug ID: 1595275 Summary: please add TOC of page's sections Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: extras-orphan(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: wolf_volpi(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The "Installing Using Anaconda" page is hard to navigate because it has over 50 headings! Document URL: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/f28/install-guide/install/Installing_Using_A… Suggestion: For longer pages of "Installation Guide" and "System Administrator’s Guide", please add a table of contents (TOC) showing the nested sections structure of that page. Additional information: The left column of "Installation Guide" and "System Administrator’s Guide" lists pages, but not the headings within the page. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/f28/install-guide/ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/f28/system-administrators-guide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Jun '18

25 Jun '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1364 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Jun '18

18 Jun '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1357 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jun '18

11 Jun '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1350 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 929426] firewalld: forward chain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Jun '18

08 Jun '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929426 --- Comment #9 from Mai Ling <mailinglists35(a)gmail.com> --- and another stupid thing is that you must specify the physical interface name like in traditional iptables, but I expected it to integrate nicely with networkmanager and I expected to be able to write connection names, not interface names, and then I expected it to automatically translate to physical interface names! but I guess I have too high expectations of firewalld... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 929426] firewalld: forward chain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Jun '18

08 Jun '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929426 --- Comment #8 from Mai Ling <mailinglists35(a)gmail.com> --- this is even more stupid. direct rules do not work with interface 'any', you must explicitly set both physical interface name for input and output. so "-i interface1 -o any" does not work! (tested on RHEL 7.5) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 929426] firewalld: forward chain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Jun '18

08 Jun '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929426 Mai Ling <mailinglists35(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mailinglists35(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Mai Ling <mailinglists35(a)gmail.com> --- this is stupid. having to add direct rules is stupid. why does not firewalld offer a native way to add rules to chain FORWARD in table filter? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1343 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa June 2018