docs-qa December 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
180 discussions

[Bug 1045205] New: post-f19 askmethod behavior should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '14

16 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045205 Bug ID: 1045205 Summary: post-f19 askmethod behavior should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: awilliam(a)redhat.com, g.kaviyarasu(a)hotmail.com, jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, kanarip(a)kanarip.com, maurizio.antillon(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, rtguille(a)gmail.com, sbueno(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 889887 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #889887 +++ Description of problem: If one boots the netinstall to install over nfs (or anything that is not closest mirror) one needs to wait for closest mirror to be ready. In my case it is about 20 minutes, but that will be different for other people. The issue is that anaconda has already selected (correctly) closest mirror for the netinstall iso, but it is cannot be interrupted. I wanted to install from nfs source over wi-fi but i must wait my SLOW(TM) internet connection prior to selecting nfs as an INSTALLATION SOURCE. If anaconda has access to the internet, everything has to wait for closest mirror to be ready. Please, consider adding a small timeout that allows one to enter INSTALLATION DESTINATION to override the closes mirror. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F18-TC2 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot anaconda netinstall 2. wait for closest mirror to be ready 3. select your nfs installation source and install. Actual results: long wait for an installation source to be setup which will not be used. Expected results: some time to enter INSTALLATION SOURCE and be able to select nfs (or other) without waiting for closest mirror. Additional info: --- Additional comment from Chris Lumens on 2013-01-22 15:30:11 EST --- I do somewhat agree, given that we've got this shiny installation source UI that we then don't really let you use. On the other hand, our threading/spoke stuff doesn't really work in this direction. Threads can wait on other things to be completed but there's not really any way to stop a thread when you enter a spoke. So, I think implementation of this would be very difficult. Would you settle for a check for the old "askmethod" command line parameter and not immediately fire up the mirror checking stuff if that parameter exists? --- Additional comment from Reartes Guillermo on 2013-01-23 16:46:11 EST --- > Would you settle for a check for the old "askmethod" command line parameter > and not immediately fire up the mirror checking stuff if that parameter exists? I have no objection for such proposal. The current workaround (Fedora Release NetInstall ISO) is: 1. Start Anaconda and reach the MAIN HUB 2. Enter NETWORK CONFGURATION and 'disable' the Network 3. Wait for INSTALLATION SOURCE to be back in 'Nothing Selected' 4. Enter NETWORK CONFGURATION and 'enable' the Network 5. Enter INSTALLATION SOURCE and now select NFS or other. In my test (KVM Guest) it works, but i don't know if this workaround do work with all network cards at them moment. (It should but there could be bugs). Since this workaround is somewhat simple, maybe it should be documented as the default way of aborting the automatic selection of closest mirror by Anaconda for NetInstall Images. In that case, nothing new is needed. Cheers. --- Additional comment from Adam Williamson on 2013-05-11 02:33:13 EDT --- Tested with F19 Beta TC3. The askmethod behaviour described in c#1 has been added. It works, though it's somewhat ugly: it leaves the Installation Source spoke in an 'error' condition. But it works. --- Additional comment from Adam Williamson on 2013-05-13 12:38:48 EDT --- Note, Reartes took the testing further than me, and found that if you actually try to complete an install with the new parameter, it fails: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962098 . --- Additional comment from Reartes Guillermo on 2013-06-01 17:05:55 EDT --- There parameter 'askmethod', it is still not usable due to the issue in comment #3. Re-Tested with F19b RC4 (19.30-1) --- Additional comment from Adam Williamson on 2013-06-02 13:54:58 EDT --- How do you mean 'not usable'? It does what it's meant to do: lets you go into the spoke immediately. I wouldn't call that 'not usable'. ======================================== Also refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda_Boot_Options?rd=Anaconda/Options Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=889887 [Bug 889887] please add a small timeout in netinstall images for INSTALLATION SOURCE that permits one to override the 'closest mirror' selection (and the long wait it might imply) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1008204] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008204 Bug ID: 1008204 Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, pspacek(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, tbabej(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998522 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured zones. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. --- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT --- It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for Fedora 20 beta. From: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface (i.e. revert patches for user interface) --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT --- Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version to rawhide. Thanks for update! ----------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1008203] New: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008203 Bug ID: 1008203 Summary: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pspacek(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tbabej(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998522 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998522 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: DNSSEC support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC FreeIPA with integrated DNS server will support serving of DNSSEC secured zones. --- Additional comment from Tomas Babej on 2013-08-28 10:22:11 EDT --- This feature is self-contained and not in a testable state yet. It is planned for FreeIPA 3.4 Beta release which is aligned with the F20 schedule. --- Additional comment from Petr Spacek on 2013-09-02 07:18:58 EDT --- It is possible that we will not be able to complete the feature in time for Fedora 20 beta. From: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3DNSSEC#Contingency_Plan Contingency mechanism: Do not expose new feature in FreeIPA's user interface (i.e. revert patches for user interface) --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-09-04 08:28:20 EDT --- Ok, in case you won't be able to finish it by Beta Change Deadline (currently planned for 2013-10-08), let me know and put the bug to the NEW state, version to rawhide. Thanks for update! ----------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion available at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001193.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1002289] New: it is deprecated, right?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Dec '14

08 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002289 Bug ID: 1002289 Summary: it is deprecated, right? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: translation-quick-start-guide Assignee: noriko(a)redhat.com Reporter: kraymond(a)shaiton.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: aalam(a)redhat.com, dimitris(a)glezos.com, mail(a)fabian-affolter.ch, noriko(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Hi, this guide is deprecated IMHO. The L10n team moved to the wiki while we moved from transifex.fedoraproject.org to fedora.transifex.net The new guide is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Guide I removed this guide from the fedora-docs release at transifex.com (but it's just a name to gather guides). The guide is still at https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/translation-quick-start-guide/ I can see that Raven has blocked the translations. nice. Please update (or close?) the fedorahosted repo https://fedorahosted.org/translation-quick-start-guide/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008575] New: Install Guide Tweaking
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Dec '14

07 Dec '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008575 Bug ID: 1008575 Summary: Install Guide Tweaking Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Please consider corrections for Fedora 20 install guide. The following is my feedback for F19 Install guide. Description of problem: Improvement recommendation for Install Guide. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Insta… Under 1.1. Typographic Conventions The indented paragraph reads To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell prompt and press Enter to execute the command. I would replace the word "see" with view. To view the contents of the... For me, "see" would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view the contents. As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder" whereas view translates to "voir". Il voit le contenu. Please correct for Fedora 20. ====== Further on the same page... Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data loss. My comment. Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not attended to, will most likely cause data loss. ======= Follow page with Introduction Introduction This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free and open source software. Please change ... built on ... to built with. My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is built with free and open source software ======= Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you say "Install Fedora onto a computer"? If the latter is more correct, this fragment is found within the Audience section. ======= 2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files? To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download, refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”. Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in "Of which Architecture Is My Computer?" (sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001374] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001374 Bug ID: 1001374 Summary: Web Assets Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely to other code in the distribution. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001371] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001371 Bug ID: 1001371 Summary: Web Assets Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely to other code in the distribution. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008210] New: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008210 Bug ID: 1008210 Summary: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: abokovoy(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998502 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998502 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3TransitiveTrusts FreeIPA will support transitive trusts with Active Directory --- Additional comment from Alexander Bokovoy on 2013-08-26 23:20:18 EDT --- I'm on vacation and will only be able to work fully on the feature starting September. ----------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185634.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1015896] New: Documentation error in FreeIPA guide "Setting up a Kerberized NFS Server"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015896 Bug ID: 1015896 Summary: Documentation error in FreeIPA guide "Setting up a Kerberized NFS Server" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: freeipa-guide Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Reporter: bschneiders(a)woti.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dlackey(a)redhat.com Description of problem: A command example is missing from the text of the guide. This example still exists in the coresponding RHEL documentation. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/kerb-nfs.h… Actual results: If ipa-getkeytab command is run on the NFS server, then save the keys directly to the host keytab. For example: For a Fedora machine, that's all you need to do. Expected results: If ipa-getkeytab command is run on the NFS server, then save the keys directly to the host keytab. For example: [jsmith@server ~]$ ipa-getkeytab -s server.example.com -p nfs/nfs-server.example.com -k /etc/krb5.keytab For a Fedora machine, that's all you need to do. Additional info: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1001356] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001356 Bug ID: 1001356 Summary: No Default Syslog Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998573 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically, remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. In particular, review for coverage of `journalctl` and journald features. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2013