docs-qa December 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
180 discussions

[Bug 986370] New: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '14

07 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986370 Bug ID: 986370 Summary: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: justin.mitchell.bennett(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Description of problem: With OEMs shipping preloads of Windows 8 on new purchase computers, UEFI tends to be enabled by default. Though Fedora can work with a secure boot UEFI bios, certain features have been disable (See Fedora 18 UEFI Secure Boot Edition 18.4). As hibernation (suspend to disk) functionality has been disabled on an UEFI Secure Boot system, users need to be aware, prior to installation of Fedora (as sole OS on the system), whether to enable or disable this functionality. Those using Fedora on a laptop/netbook, shouldn't discover *after* completing installation, that hibernation has been disabled. It becomes a huge pain, to google how to disable the /boot/efi partition, and grub2, if even possible. If not documented or referenced in the install-guide, CommonBugs should make note of this issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 18, Fedora 19 How reproducible: Install Fedora on a system with a Secure Boot, UEFI, enabled bios. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001049] New: Reinstallation method is not explained
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001049 Bug ID: 1001049 Summary: Reinstallation method is not explained Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: wifienclair(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In paragraph 18.1 Determining Whether to Upgrade or Re-Install, it is written: "This recommended reinstallation method helps to ensure the best system stability possible." But I didn't find a reinstallation method in the document. I suggest to replace this sentence by something like: "The reinstallation method is recommended to ensure the best system stability possible." and to add a paragraph or a chapter on how to reinstall. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1012697] New: There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4 chapter (Kickstart options) and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012697 Bug ID: 1012697 Summary: There are inconcistencies between Install Guide's 15.4 chapter (Kickstart options) and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co It seems Wiki is more updated, because at least in "upgrade" option shows a note like this: "Note that from F18 onward, upgrades are no longer supported in anaconda and should be done with FedUp, the Fedora update tool.", whereas in Install Guide this note doesn't exist. And there are more differences between these two places, so I'm confused about which of these is the right place to have the right reference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1001367] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367 Bug ID: 1001367 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001187.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1021602] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021602 Bug ID: 1021602 Summary: Visible Cloud Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998582 Blocks: 1001367, 1001368 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now, let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:45:00 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Matthew Miller on 2013-10-15 14:41:27 EDT --- Here's the current status: A) New web site design will put cloud on equal footing as described. Will continue to work with web team on this. B) Yes, we have basic cloud image release criteria. C) The updated koji isn't in place for image generation with the new method, so we will just use the old one. Not a problem but we may need to kludge things differently in the kickstart file. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-16 06:58:37 EDT --- Ok, thanks, setting the Change to ON_QA. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998582 [Bug 998582] Visible Cloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367 [Bug 1001367] Visible Cloud https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001368 [Bug 1001368] Visible Cloud -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001335] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335 Bug ID: 1001335 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, rhughes(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186166.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021600] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021600 Bug ID: 1021600 Summary: Application Installer Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998562, 1002288 Blocks: 1001335, 1001336 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-27 11:26:43 EDT --- Application Installer is tracked/still under discussion by FESCo. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-28 14:43:51 EDT --- Current status from Change Page: The hawkey backend is available in PackageKit git master. gnome-software is available in git.gnome.org. Neither is in f20 yet. We are aiming for a first gnome-software release by end of August, and will package it asap, then. --- Additional comment from Matthias Clasen on 2013-09-02 13:52:34 EDT --- gnome-software has been built for f20 today --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:26 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-21 09:06:29 EDT --- Change is completed, moving to ON_QA as agreed with the owner. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998562 [Bug 998562] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335 [Bug 1001335] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001336 [Bug 1001336] Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002288 [Bug 1002288] Review Request: gnome-software - A software center for GNOME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1036625] New: Link to docs.redhat.com should properly link to access.redhat.com
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036625 Bug ID: 1036625 Summary: Link to docs.redhat.com should properly link to access.redhat.com Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In Section 3, Acknowledgements, link to "docs.redhat.com" (correctly) redirects to access.redhat.com, but links should really link directly to the correct page, I think. Not sure if this has already been logged, it's possible there are other links with the same property. rday -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001364] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001364 Bug ID: 1001364 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001195.h… and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186623.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1021603] New: Unversioned Docdirs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021603 Bug ID: 1021603 Summary: Unversioned Docdirs Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Tracking Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: adam(a)spicenitz.org, jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com, ville.skytta(a)iki.fi, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 993551 (F20UnversionedDocDirs), 998579 Blocks: 1001364, 1001365 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998579 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Unversioned Docdirs For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs Install package specific documentation to an unversioned subdir in /usr/share/doc. --- Additional comment from Adam Goode on 2013-09-25 22:50:18 EDT --- This should be fixed in rawhide. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:54 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993551 [Bug 993551] F20 Unversioned doc dirs tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998579 [Bug 998579] Unversioned Docdirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001364 [Bug 1001364] Unversioned Docdirs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001365 [Bug 1001365] Unversioned Docdirs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2013