July 2013 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 982835] New: 6.1. Updating Packages with Software Update

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982835 Bug ID: 982835 Summary: 6.1. Updating Packages with Software Update Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 6.1 has the wrong location for the software updates utility. The location it should be is: activities --> applications --> Software Update -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 970468] New: Inconsistent expression in Development section of Fedora 19 release notes

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970468 Bug ID: 970468 Summary: Inconsistent expression in Development section of Fedora 19 release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: Under Development section, There is a paragraph: Python programmers who use the xml ... <package>PyXML</package> replaced the <function>stdlib</function> code with its own ... code and unmaintained upstream. I think what the sentence "<package>PyXML</package> replaced the <function>stdlib</function> code with its own" expressing is wrong and inconsistent with previous statement. <package>PyXML</package> is replaced, not <function>stdlib</function>. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 beta How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: It should be changed. For example, change it to: <function>stdlib</function> replaced the <package>PyXML</package> code with its own. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 972458] New: kickstart ks= kernel command line options are documented incorrectly

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972458 Bug ID: 972458 Summary: kickstart ks= kernel command line options are documented incorrectly Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jreed(a)redhat.com Reporter: jlayton(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreed(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Table 11.2 on this page seems to have the wrong syntax listed for ks= options: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/sn-... It says: ks=hd:/device/directory/ks.cfg ...but really, it should be: ks=hd:device:/directory/ks.cfg ...I think the others are similarly incorrect, but don't have a good way to confirm that at the moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 977771] New: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile" be in the past tense?

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977771 Bug ID: 977771 Summary: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile" be in the past tense? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: In the following sentence: "In previous releases, journal data was stored in <filename>/var/run/journal</filename>, which is volatile and cleared on reboot." Should "which is volatile..." be written in the past tense? Does it mean "which was volatile..."? I'm sorry if I misunderstand the sentence. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 973800] New: PXE boot: GRUB splash.xpm.gz no longer exists

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973800 Bug ID: 973800 Summary: PXE boot: GRUB splash.xpm.gz no longer exists Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jreed(a)redhat.com Reporter: jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreed(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/s1-... cp /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz /var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux/splash.xpm.gz Fedora 18 x86_64 no longer has /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz . GRUB2 does not seems to have such file. (I do not yet know if it matters to omit this file.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 973173] New: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973173 Bug ID: 973173 Summary: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Created attachment 759599 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=759599&action=edit Fix typo Description of problem: Desktop.xml for F19 has a typo. Look at the following diff (the patch is attached): diff --git a/en-US/Desktop.xml b/en-US/Desktop.xml index 9bd23e1..99bf5d7 100644 --- a/en-US/Desktop.xml +++ b/en-US/Desktop.xml @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The latest release of the popular desktop environment <productname>Cinnamon</productname> brings new features and polish to Fedora &PRODVER;, including: <simplelist> <member> - <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily modified to itegrate it's behavior with Cinnamon. + <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily modified to itegrate its behavior with Cinnamon. </member> <member> <emphasis>screensaver</emphasis> has been improved, including a lock screen with customizable away message. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 972256] New: The release notes on the website have grammar errors, missing words. Not all my corrections were implemented.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972256 Bug ID: 972256 Summary: The release notes on the website have grammar errors, missing words. Not all my corrections were implemented. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Created attachment 758390 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=758390&action=edit Corrected Fedora 19 release notes. Description of problem: I worked on the draft of the release notes, pointed out via markups, errors in grammer, missing words and miss spellings. It was decided to not correct some of the errors and publish. I have prepared a document which highlights the errors, and most of all, corrects an omission in an Appendix A3. My original release notes submission was done at end-April. Hereto this bug is an update to the release notes. I would use the collaboration features of libreoffice, but not everyone knows how to use it. Therefore I have resorted to coloring text yellow to show removals, red to show insertions and to also insert words that were omitted. I also asked some questions as to what the author was trying to say. We all, myself included are guilty of omitting words when we write our first draft. Because we think while we write, a good proof read of the document is needed. So I am reporting 25+ corrections to the release notes shown on the website. The document with the corrections is attached. I am also very disappointed that the proofreading effort was not recognized. In that regard, I included an additional Appendix A3. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 Release notes. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 971252] New: [PATCH] various improvements to the new web development section

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971252 Bug ID: 971252 Summary: [PATCH] various improvements to the new web development section Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Created attachment 757490 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=757490&action=edit [PATCH 1/2] add information about Django 1.5 I added a section for the new version of Django and improved the Node.js section a little bit. Unfortunately I came up empty with other ideas for this, though. :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 963274] New: Typos in Fedora 19 Release Notes

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963274 Bug ID: 963274 Summary: Typos in Fedora 19 Release Notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: yurchor(a)ukr.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Category: --- Created attachment 748332 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=748332&action=edit Patch to fix typos Description of problem: There are some minor typos in RN beta files Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): git/master How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: open files from the patch attached Actual results: asychonous capabilties Detials Expected results: asynchronous capabilities Details Additional info: Thanks for fixing these typos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 920298] New: press "any key" to show GRUB menu incorrect

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920298 Bug ID: 920298 Summary: press "any key" to show GRUB menu incorrect Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com Description of problem: Documentation says to use "any key" to get to a hidden GRUB menu on startup, needs to be changed to Esc key. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 18 Actual results: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/s1-... "any key" appears twice "a key" appears once Expected results: All three should say "Esc key" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa July 2013