[Bug 1008575] New: Install Guide Tweaking
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008575
Bug ID: 1008575
Summary: Install Guide Tweaking
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: low
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Please consider corrections for Fedora 20 install guide. The following is my
feedback for F19 Install guide.
Description of problem:
Improvement recommendation for Install Guide.
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/Ins...
Under
1.1. Typographic Conventions
The indented paragraph reads
To see the contents of the file my_next_bestselling_novel in your current
working directory, enter the cat my_next_bestselling_novel command at the shell
prompt and press Enter to execute the command.
I would replace the word "see" with view.
To view the contents of the...
For me, "see" would be the result of issuing the ls command. See the file, view
the contents.
As an aside, for French translation, "to see" translates to "regarder"
whereas view translates to "voir". Il voit le contenu.
Please correct for Fedora 20.
======
Further on the same page...
Warnings should not be ignored. Ignoring warnings will most likely cause data
loss.
My comment.
Warnings do not cause data loss. Warnings advise of a situation that if not
attended to, will most likely cause data loss.
=======
Follow page with Introduction
Introduction
This guide covers installation of Fedora, a Linux distribution built on free
and open source software.
Please change ... built on ... to built with.
My reasoning... You may be on topic, or build on a foundation, but Fedora is
built with free and open source software
=======
Another question. Would you say, "Install Fedora on a computer," or would you
say "Install Fedora onto a computer"? If the latter is more correct, this
fragment is found within the Audience section.
=======
2.1.1. How Do I Download Installation Files?
To follow a Web-based guide to downloading, visit
http://get.fedoraproject.org/. For guidance on which architecture to download,
refer to Section 2.1.2, “Which Architecture Is My Computer?”.
Would the meaning be more clear if the title started with the word "Of" as in
"Of which Architecture Is My Computer?"
(sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 1069985] New: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart options
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069985
Bug ID: 1069985
Summary: Release notes should contain changes to kickstart
options
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: edgar.hoch(a)ims.uni-stuttgart.de
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
Release notes for Fedora 20 contains nothing about the changes to kickstart
options.
It would be helpful if changes to kickstart options will be noticed in future
release notes too. Now I know that I have to check the wiki diffs of the
Anaconda/Kickstart wiki page to see the changes, but other administrators may
check only the release notes.
An example is the "--addsupport=" option to the "lang" kickstart option which
was added to Fedora 20 (I assume... - I have no information about the time of
the change), together with "%packages ... -instLangs=..." still not
implemented.
Please see also at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051816#c11
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 20 release notes.
How reproducible:
Always.
Another note:
This request is to improve the next release notes.
But I want to note that there should a place (web page, wiki page, etc.) too
where additional (late) informations can be added to release notes of already
released Fedora versions. Is such a place available?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 1060328] New: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060328
Bug ID: 1060328
Summary: Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no
longer installed
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: toby(a)ovod-everett.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
The Fedora 20 Release Notes imply that rsyslog is no longer installed (section
2.8.1) during normal installs. It appears, according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSyslog, that it got moved
from @core to @standard. However, I suspect that a lot of users will do
installs that include @standard, and as a result they will get rsyslog
installed and perhaps be confused as to why they got it when the Release Notes
imply it is no longer included. I can confirm that the
repodata/ac802acf81ab55a0eca1fe5d1222bd15b8fab45d302dfdf4e626716d374b6a64-Fedora-20-comps.xml
file on the x86_64 install DVD contains rsyslog in the @standard package group.
Also, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Changes/NoDefaultSendmail implies
that sendmail got moved from @core to @standard, whereas it appears to me that
it actually got removed from both of them (at least I can't find it anywhere in
the comps.xml file).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 20 x86_64
DVD.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 1063068] New: Wrong distribution mentioned ;)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063068
Bug ID: 1063068
Summary: Wrong distribution mentioned ;)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide
Severity: medium
Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com
Reporter: hetz(a)hetz.biz
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
the page regarding the compatibility mentioning wrong Linux distributin
Here is the page: http://hetz.me/y30lk
As you can see, it mentions "Fedora 6". IMHO it should be Red Hat Enterprise
Linux 6 - as Fedora 6 is dead long time ago ;)
Also, Where can I see the latest version of the doc? or is it always the same
URL as right now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 7 months
[Bug 1001374] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001374
Bug ID: 1001374
Summary: Web Assets
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org,
sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com,
tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to
people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have
been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for
shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely
to other code in the distribution.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197...
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 8 months
[Bug 1001371] New: Web Assets
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001371
Bug ID: 1001371
Summary: Web Assets
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 997677 (F20WebAssets), 998583
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998583 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Web Assets
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Traditionally, Fedora has been pushing bits from its various servers to
people's browsers in an ad-hoc fashion, and issues surrounding JavaScript have
been swept under the rug. This change proposal provides a simple framework for
shipping static web content and a way forward to treat JavaScript more closely
to other code in the distribution.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 8 months
[Bug 1088758] New: NetworkManager should be off when used with FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088758
Bug ID: 1088758
Summary: NetworkManager should be off when used with FreeIPA
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: freeipa-guide
Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: artur.szymczak(a)nadzieja.pl
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: dlackey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
WHen you read FreeIPA Fedora Guide:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/FreeIPA_Guide/install...
it says:
[quote]
The default networking service used by Fedora is NetworkManager, and due to
the way this service works, it can cause problems with FreeIPA and the KDC.
Consequently, it is highly recommended that you use the network service to
manage the networking requirements in a FreeIPA environment and disable the
NetworkManager service.
[/quote]
It is highly recommended to use NetworkManager instead of network service,
because of systemd, and all related to it stuff. So I think it should be fied
in doc, or in FreeIPA itself.
Btw, it should be writed, why we should disable NetworkManager (some more
details) if it is still accurate.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 8 months
[Bug 1008210] New: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008210
Bug ID: 1008210
Summary: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for
FreeIPA
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: abokovoy(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998502
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998502 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory
support for FreeIPA
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3TransitiveTrusts
FreeIPA will support transitive trusts with Active Directory
--- Additional comment from Alexander Bokovoy on 2013-08-26 23:20:18 EDT ---
I'm on vacation and will only be able to work fully on the feature starting
September.
-----------------------------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185634.html
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 8 months